| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Computing for Clean Water Forum
Thread: Long crunch times |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 21
|
|
| Author |
|
|
JSYKES
Senior Cruncher Joined: Apr 28, 2007 Post Count: 206 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I am just about to start the first of 20 target02's in the next hour - it will be interesting to see how these compare with the 01's that have all run in 1.65-1.85 hrs so far......the anticipated times are the same for 02's as 01's - reality may be different...or not??!!
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
nanoprobe
Master Cruncher Classified Joined: Aug 29, 2008 Post Count: 2998 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I am just about to start the first of 20 target02's in the next hour - it will be interesting to see how these compare with the 01's that have all run in 1.65-1.85 hrs so far......the anticipated times are the same for 02's as 01's - reality may be different...or not??!! On the first machine of mine that received some it took about 1 hour longer to finish.
In 1969 I took an oath to defend and protect the U S Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Domestic. There was no expiration date.
  |
||
|
|
nasher
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Dec 2, 2005 Post Count: 1423 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
the target 2's seem to be taking about 4 hours on my computer .. not an issue just a cache size shift from 1.5-2 hour to 4 hour WU's
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
seippel
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Apr 16, 2009 Post Count: 392 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I guess we'll never know. I let the one that was 14% complete run to see what would happen. Something happened and the computer was completely locked up this afternoon when I got home from work. Had to do a hard reboot and when I checked all of the WUs that were crunching or in cache were gone and the client downloaded a whole new set of WUs. I have no idea what happened. It doesn't appear to be a problem with the work units you referenced themselves. I tested with c4cw_target01_639219861 on both linux and windows and was able to successfully complete both. Have you had any problems with c4cw work units you've run since the reboot? Also was the problem experienced on just once machine or multiple machines? |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hi.
The new c4cw_target02 are taking about an hour longer on my x6 1055T. Up form around 1hr, 30min, to 2hr, 40min not to bad.  ( stock speed ) |
||
|
|
bieberj
Senior Cruncher United States Joined: Dec 2, 2004 Post Count: 406 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Used to take approximately 2 hours and 6 minutes. Now it's approximately 3 hours and 53 minutes. Not quite double the time. Not quite double the credits :-)
|
||
|
|
nanoprobe
Master Cruncher Classified Joined: Aug 29, 2008 Post Count: 2998 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
It doesn't appear to be a problem with the work units you referenced themselves. I tested with c4cw_target01_639219861 on both linux and windows and was able to successfully complete both. Have you had any problems with c4cw work units you've run since the reboot? Also was the problem experienced on just once machine or multiple machines? I'm curious as to how long it took you to complete those WUs. To answer your questions, I've had no problems since the reboot and the problem was only with one machine and it hasn't happened again. Does anyone have a plausible explanation as to why the WU's were detached when I rebooted?
In 1969 I took an oath to defend and protect the U S Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Domestic. There was no expiration date.
|
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
I've had a bunch of repair jobs that seem to have been detached by one or 2 devices within minutes from a client getting them. In principle detached means the whole project was removed from the client. I'm thinking someone has an Account Manager conflict. If your client is attached an AMS such as BAM, then project attaching must be done through the AMS, and not directly manually. Somewhere in the AMS profile there is a box that needs to be ticked behind WCG... something like "attach to all new hosts". Since I've done that, I've never incurred that issue again even when manually attach WCG to a client.
----------------------------------------Note I'm not BAM support, I just know from past that the source is there somewhere! edit: spellcheck
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Sep 3, 2010 4:03:45 PM] |
||
|
|
seippel
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Apr 16, 2009 Post Count: 392 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I'm curious as to how long it took you to complete those WUs. On the windows machine it completed in 3hr 6min, while the linux machine completed it in 2hr 12min. |
||
|
|
nanoprobe
Master Cruncher Classified Joined: Aug 29, 2008 Post Count: 2998 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I'm curious as to how long it took you to complete those WUs. On the windows machine it completed in 3hr 6min, while the linux machine completed it in 2hr 12min. Interesting. Makes me wonder why the same WU was at only at 6% on my machine after 8+ hours.  Thanks for the info.
In 1969 I took an oath to defend and protect the U S Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Domestic. There was no expiration date.
|
||
|
|
|