| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Help Fight Childhood Cancer Project Forum
Thread: Monster WU |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 10
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
HFCC_ n1_ 00400004_ n1_ 0001_ 0-- - In Progress 8/8/10 20:16:29 8/18/10 20:16:29 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
Currently 12.5 hrs and 50%, running normal, just long, this box normally does 8-10 hrs on HFCC wu Not a problem, just want to let folks know that they are out there  |
||
|
|
Falconet
Master Cruncher Portugal Joined: Mar 9, 2009 Post Count: 3315 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I once had a 36 hour HFCC wu(CPU time) on a dual core.Validated well
---------------------------------------- - AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W - AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W - AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
this box also is duel core amd x2, 6.2.28 client currently running 2 HFCC both approx 53% one 6 hrs in, other 13 ;)
----------------------------------------edit: fininshed and validated at 24.27 hrs, 228 points  [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Aug 11, 2010 6:07:34 PM] |
||
|
|
I need a bath
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Apr 12, 2007 Post Count: 347 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I have a couple monsters running right now, One is over 33 hours and only 80%.
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
gb009761
Master Cruncher Scotland Joined: Apr 6, 2005 Post Count: 3010 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I have a couple monsters running right now, One is over 33 hours and only 80%. I hope it validates straight away, and doesn't go "inconclusive" like a couple of my monsters did... Okay, one of them's already been verified and is now in the Valid queue, but it does add a bit of uncertainty it it all...  |
||
|
|
kskjold
Senior Cruncher Norway Joined: May 20, 2008 Post Count: 469 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
It seems to be some new monster WU's in the pipeline now.
----------------------------------------3 hour too 15 % on 3GHz pentium 4..... |
||
|
|
Falconet
Master Cruncher Portugal Joined: Mar 9, 2009 Post Count: 3315 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
The new L3 seem to be faster.
----------------------------------------9 CPU hours on a P4 2.4GHZ single core with normal usage - AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W - AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W - AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz |
||
|
|
astroWX
Advanced Cruncher USA Joined: Sep 1, 2007 Post Count: 56 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
The new L3 seem to be faster. HFCC was added, today, to c4cw on my machines. Three machines' boinc managers were forced to grab HFCC pairs from the queue, out of normal sequence. Not monsters, but I was surprised to see that, in each of the pairs, one Task ran more than twice as fast ts the other. The first two cases checked showed L3_0000 more than twice as fast as L3_0001. I thought I was on to something ... Silly me; the third machine's pair shows the opposite relationship. If nothing else, having multiple run lengths for the same project should drive boinc bonkers trying to manage <duration_correction_factor> (same as in CPDN). |
||
|
|
astroWX
Advanced Cruncher USA Joined: Sep 1, 2007 Post Count: 56 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
If nothing else, having multiple run lengths for the same project should drive boinc bonkers trying to manage <duration_correction_factor> (same as in CPDN). As expected, "To completion" times for all WCG Tasks are going ape. |
||
|
|
Crystal Pellet
Veteran Cruncher Joined: May 21, 2008 Post Count: 1405 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
For WCG average task lengths this was surely a monster or was that laptop so slow (1500MHz):
HFCC_ L3_ 01014080_ L3_ 0000_ 0-- 668066 Valid 29/11/10 09:34:00 07/12/10 10:07:45 41.31 359.1 / 311.2 |
||
|
|
|