| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 13
|
|
| Author |
|
|
JSYKES
Senior Cruncher Joined: Apr 28, 2007 Post Count: 206 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
How about this for an oddly balanced pairing of results:
----------------------------------------CMD2_ 0613-2E2B_ B.clustersOccur-2V62_ B.clustersOccur_ 0_ 1-- 614 Valid 29/06/10 11:05:22 30/06/10 08:20:10 6.00 136.8 / 108.4 CMD2_ 0613-2E2B_ B.clustersOccur-2V62_ B.clustersOccur_ 0_ 0-- 614 Valid 29/06/10 11:05:13 30/06/10 11:29:57 6.00 29.2 / 39.6 Both units show 6hrs processing time, the first scores 136.8 / 108.4 and the second 29.2 / 39.6..... ![]() |
||
|
|
Nevada Bob
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Dec 8, 2008 Post Count: 174 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
8/1/10 06:25:41 8/1/10 6.01 claimed 43.2 / credited 959.0
8/1/10 06:20:57 8/1/10 6.00 claimed 156.2 / credited 79.9 How is this one for a difference between machines? Both at 6 hours my machine got 959.0 The other guy got 79.9 |
||
|
|
gb077492
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Dec 24, 2004 Post Count: 96 Status: Offline |
About 3 days ago one of my machines suddenly started claiming significantly more (maybe twice as many) points as normal. I checked the machine's log during the time it was processing the first unit for which it made such claims. Nothing was out of the ordinary and no benchmarks were run during that time. Totally inexplicable. Most of the claims are treated as outliers and ignored, but I do get some of them
. I guess the next benchmark will "fix" it -- we'll see! |
||
|
|
|