| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Help Fight Childhood Cancer Project Forum
Thread: HFCC run times |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 24
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Suddenly I've got over 2 days worth of queued work though the real setting is 1.0 presently, all because the revival of the stalking monster jobs.
----------------------------------------22/03/2010 16:04:12 World Community Grid Computation for task HFCC_s2_00847091_s2_0001_0 finished 22/03/2010 16:04:12 World Community Grid [dcf] DCF: 1.347348->2.635727, raw_ratio 2.635727, adj_ratio 1.956233
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
Nevada Bob
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Dec 8, 2008 Post Count: 174 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I haven't seen such huge work units before:
----------------------------------------HFCC 26:38 Hrs done with 20:01 Hrs to go Total Hours:Min 46:39 Estimated HFCC 23:35 Hrs done with 11:20 Hrs to go Total Hours:Min 34:55 Estimated I sure hope nothing crashes. P4 3.4Ghz [Edit 1 times, last edit by Nevada Bob at Mar 23, 2010 12:29:09 AM] |
||
|
|
Bearcat
Master Cruncher USA Joined: Jan 6, 2007 Post Count: 2803 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Mine settled down to around 5 hrs now. Seems my mac adjusts allot when switching projects. Starting to get peeved with it. When my next build gets done, probably take it off line.
----------------------------------------
Crunching for humanity since 2007!
 |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
It's getting bigtastee, the first one to exceed 21 hours on the duo and a few more monsters via quad way.
----------------------------------------HFCC_ s2_ 00842690_ s2_ 0001_ 0-- Pending Validation 21-3-10 13:16:29 23-3-10 10:15:48 18.02 quad HFCC_ s2_ 00840020_ s2_ 0001_ 0-- Valid 21-3-10 12:34:13 23-3-10 07:53:53 21.02 duo HFCC_ s2_ 00855915_ s2_ 0000_ 0-- Valid 21-3-10 21:11:26 23-3-10 07:17:15 6.65 duo HFCC_ s2_ 00852124_ s2_ 0000_ 0-- Valid 21-3-10 20:13:30 23-3-10 05:25:03 4.78 quad HFCC_ s2_ 00855336_ s2_ 0000_ 0-- Valid 21-3-10 15:57:23 23-3-10 05:25:03 5.80 quad HFCC_ s2_ 00847093_ s2_ 0000_ 0-- Valid 21-3-10 09:38:47 23-3-10 00:16:43 17.98 duo HFCC_ s2_ 00846862_ s2_ 0001_ 0-- Valid 21-3-10 09:31:33 22-3-10 20:05:02 15.84 quad This way 25,000 results on My Grid will remain a long way away :O)
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
Nevada Bob
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Dec 8, 2008 Post Count: 174 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
1. Total 37 hours 22 minutes finished
2. 38 hours estimated to finish 3. 43 hours done estimated to finish 58 hours total P4 3.4Ghz |
|||
|
||||
|
Speedy51
Veteran Cruncher New Zealand Joined: Nov 4, 2005 Post Count: 1326 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
How is the Lehigh of a HFCC job determined? Both the following jobs were run on a I7 980X @ 3.33Ghz/HT on
----------------------------------------HFCC_ L4_ 01110545_ L4_ 0001_ 0-- 4.14 hours returned 3/6/11 & HFCC_ L4_ 01088501_ L4_ 0000_ 0-- 9.26 hours returned 3/6/11. Both jobs had 254 dockings. My questions why is there such a time difference?  |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
One compound being docked is not the same as the other [shape/size/atomic properties etc]... the whole purpose of working through the library of 2.85 million to find the best fits at lowest energy bindings... Bison-kit v Super-glue.
This being "non-deterministic" computations, one needs many more than the other. Opposed for HCC and C4CW the duration can be quite accurately predicted, hence their very low variability. --//-- |
||
|
|
Speedy51
Veteran Cruncher New Zealand Joined: Nov 4, 2005 Post Count: 1326 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Thanks SekeRob . If theres going to be more work for HFCC in the future would it be possible to add the time each docking took? eg 08:44 Finished Docking number 0
----------------------------------------09:00 Finished Docking number 1 ect, ect As is in C4CW task out put |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Not really, as the target properties itself would be different too and figuring that out just does not have any value but to reduce the volunteer's stress... and it's long known that BOINC does not like being watched. Certainly BOINC server side is not in anyway designed to predict run times on an individual result's basis, rather it works off the most recent results computed and assumes those going into the feeder next will be close to that.
------------------------------------------//-- [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Mar 7, 2011 8:00:03 PM] |
||
|
|
Speedy51
Veteran Cruncher New Zealand Joined: Nov 4, 2005 Post Count: 1326 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Thanks, think I have a better understanding now
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
|