| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Discovering Dengue Drugs - Together - Phase 2 Forum
Thread: problematic batches? |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 72
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Sorry Sekerob, did not got the impact described in your message. :-(
At least you got the points for your unit... |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
OK, don't worry, it's licked. No more -161's we should see :D
----------------------------------------
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
X-Files 27
Senior Cruncher Canada Joined: May 21, 2007 Post Count: 391 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Been running for 5.5+ hrs and the progress is still 13%+ for the these type b wus:
----------------------------------------ts01_c360_pe0000_0 ts01_c361_pe0000_0 ts01_c362_pe0000_0 The total amount of time for this wu would be like a type A. Houston, should I abort?   |
||
|
|
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor Normandy - France Joined: Jan 26, 2007 Post Count: 3716 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Been running for 5.5+ hrs and the progress is still 13%+ for the these type b wus: Without any info about the speed of the machine it is difficult to say.ts01_c360_pe0000_0 ts01_c361_pe0000_0 ts01_c362_pe0000_0 The total amount of time for this wu would be like a type A. Houston, should I abort? If this is a slow machine and the percentage moves up steadily I would say let them go on. Such WUs are needing from 5 to 8 hours on my quad at 3.16 GHz. |
||
|
|
X-Files 27
Senior Cruncher Canada Joined: May 21, 2007 Post Count: 391 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
This is an i7 OC@4.0
----------------------------------------Right now its 9 hrs for 67% |
||
|
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Let it run. They are just difficult work units.
-Uplinger |
||
|
|
X-Files 27
Senior Cruncher Canada Joined: May 21, 2007 Post Count: 391 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Roger that!
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor Normandy - France Joined: Jan 26, 2007 Post Count: 3716 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
This is an i7 OC@4.0 Right now its 9 hrs for 67% OK, thanks. Personally I would leave them complete. They are bigger than what we have seen so far but, still, nothing completely out of range. Especially since the tsxx series are used by the scientists to experiment with their batch creation techniques. ---------------------------------------- [Edit 1 times, last edit by JmBoullier at Apr 10, 2010 10:49:14 PM] |
||
|
|
darth_vader
Veteran Cruncher A galaxy far, far away... Joined: Jul 13, 2005 Post Count: 514 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
ts06_ a011_ pr78b0_ 3-- 617 User Aborted 4/10/10 15:53:23 4/11/10 00:09:07 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
ts06_ a011_ pr78b0_ 2-- 617 Error 4/10/10 15:45:31 4/10/10 15:52:58 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 ts06_ a011_ pr78b0_ 0-- 617 Error 4/10/10 15:33:59 4/10/10 15:42:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 This WU upset my system quite a bit. It was at 0% after 15+ minutes CPU time and consuming over 500M memory before Windows started taking system dumps. This system hasn't had problems with any other DDDT2 WUs. Pentium D, 3.2ghz, WinXP SP3 2GB. - D |
||
|
|
Somervillejudson@netscape.net
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: May 16, 2008 Post Count: 1065 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Had this one run yesterday on a slower machine ts02_ c108_ pe0000_ 0-- for 14.29 hours. Usually it is about half the speed of my i7 3.33, so seems there are some larger WU's out there. The other work units were about 2 hours.
----------------------------------------[Edit 1 times, last edit by judson Somerville MD at Apr 11, 2010 3:15:23 AM] |
||
|
|
|