| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 60
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Highwire
Cruncher Joined: Aug 18, 2006 Post Count: 39 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Temp is from a probe sitting as far as I could poke it into heatsink but it's quite informative, I can tell at a glance if cpu is idle for some reason.
I've also SpeedFan which gives various temps, latest one (needed for w7) gives individual cores. |
||
|
|
Highwire
Cruncher Joined: Aug 18, 2006 Post Count: 39 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Back on W7 x64... uninstalled AV, rebooted, set all the tasks (currently HFCC) up from 'idle' to 'below normal' i.e. a higher priority (not that it should make any difference), and one that had just started is @ 8.6%, for time 1:12 - already indicating runtime more than double 3-5 hours.
So AV pretty ruled out conclusively. |
||
|
|
Highwire
Cruncher Joined: Aug 18, 2006 Post Count: 39 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
******I'VE SOLVED THIS I THINK********
Or rather my subconcious solved this! Woke up this morning and in my brain was bubbling the thought 'when I first put BoincMgr shortcut into startup folder - didn't I have lots of trouble because of that UAC *B*LLSH*T* and changed it to compatibility mode to try and get round it'. I went and checked and it was in W2k compatibility mode. I've switched this off, killed and restarted boincmgr, and so far, they DO appear to be running an amazing > 2x faster, and are on target for reasonable times. I've no idea why: * This would only affect SOME tasks and not others, and * I've certainly run (and am running) FAAH on W2k proper for vast lengths of time with no problem. * Compatibility mode of a maths crunching program that surely isn't making lots of API calls (?) would have such a devastating effect. I mean compat mode is NOT an emulator, it just changes ways some API calls are handled etc, i.e. the application <-> windows interaction? But that seems to have been it (unless launching outwith startup phase is the fix, surely not). I've spent hoooouurs on this myself trying to solve it, was almost giving up. Surely implies the compat mode is inherited by the child processes the way boincmgr creates them? I'd completely forgotten I'd done this when I installed W7 and didn't think to check my shortcut (but my subconcious hadn't )So: worth remembering if anyone in future complains, *COMPATIBILITY MODE SCREWS UP FAAH AND HFCC*. Re: Startup and UAC if you're interested - when I put shortcut into the startup folder day I installed W7, BoincMgr would fail to start when I booted. It's to do with that UAC nonsense where it asks you every time an app it doesn't like runs (with no way of saying 'don't ask again for this app'), if you are going to allow it. If it decides it want to do this to an app in the startup list, it just won't ask and won't run the ****ing app, so you start machine up and the app just isn't running. I tried a number of things to try and get round this, one of them being trying to run the app in compatbility mode, I think that was a suggestion on net. Move along, nothing to see here! ![]() |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Now remember you could not be bothered about upgrading from 5.10.45? In this version the user install starts the core client, thus indeed inheriting. In 6.2 and up the core client (boinc.exe) is installed as a separate service not needing the BM. 6.2. was build to cater for Vista issues [such as UAC] and thus also dealing with the same issues in W7, it definitely being a first to hear someone applying a compatibility mode to the BM.
----------------------------------------earmarked for future consultation.
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
Highwire
Cruncher Joined: Aug 18, 2006 Post Count: 39 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Now remember you could not be bothered about upgrading from 5.10.45? In this version the user install starts the core client, thus indeed inheriting. In 6.2 and up the core client (boinc.exe) is installed as a separate service not needing the BM. 6.2. was build to cater for Vista issues [such as UAC] and thus also dealing with the same issues in W7, it definitely being a first to hear someone applying a compatibility mode to the BM. It wasn't remotely "couldn't be bothered" it was logical in that firstly I had an existing installation that had half finished jobs that I didn't want to lose, that I was going to be booting back into old windows version from time to time and wanted boinc to continue seamlessly, and I wanted to keep project history attached to this machine and I'm sure last time I reinstalled I lost this. Also if I remember correctly, you don't give out 6.2 to people who come to WCG, you were referring me to go to berkeley 'special', so it makes no sense for me to be requiring a special version if that's not what you're giving to everyone else. Also, the 5.X verison CAN already be installed as a service, I tend NOT to do that. I'm pretty sure you never said 6.2 was made to fix vista / w7 issues, and if it was, why aren't WCG giving it out to these users? (unless I'm mistaken they aren't?) I was correct : it was NOT the client version causing the issue, it was me fiddling with a shortcut, forced because of Microsofts ill thought out UAC security sticking plaster. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
current version on WCG site is 6.2.28 and has been for quite a while, you were refered to berkley site for 64 bit app which is not officially supported by WCG yet
|
||
|
|
Ingleside
Veteran Cruncher Norway Joined: Nov 19, 2005 Post Count: 974 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
It wasn't remotely "couldn't be bothered" it was logical in that firstly I had an existing installation that had half finished jobs that I didn't want to lose, that I was going to be booting back into old windows version from time to time and wanted boinc to continue seamlessly, and I wanted to keep project history attached to this machine and I'm sure last time I reinstalled I lost this. The only problem you'll likely to hit on upgrading is if you're switching between 32-bit and 64-bit clients... But granted dual-booting does have it's special considerations to take into consideration, and chances are you'll manually need to change access-rights on BOINC data-directory. Also if I remember correctly, you don't give out 6.2 to people who come to WCG, you were referring me to go to berkeley 'special', so it makes no sense for me to be requiring a special version if that's not what you're giving to everyone else. Also, the 5.X verison CAN already be installed as a service, I tend NOT to do that. I'm pretty sure you never said 6.2 was made to fix vista / w7 issues, and if it was, why aren't WCG giving it out to these users? (unless I'm mistaken they aren't?) Would expect Sekerob was pointing-out the 64-bit client to you, and if so you'll need to download it from Berkeley since WCG doesn't have any 64-bit clients. For the 32-bit client on the other hand, using the WCG-build is the "recommended" for WCG-users. BTW, if you're not taking part in other BOINC-projects besides WCG, it doesn't really matter on crunch-speed if you're using a 32-bit or 64-bit BOINC-client, since WCG doesn't have any 64-bit applications. Forgetting to mention that v6.2.xx was mainly geared to make BOINC compatible with Vista is an oversight. Since win7 inherits most of the functionality from Vista, the same is true for win7. If there's any specific win7-tweaks added to BOINC later-on I'm not sure, but v6.2.xx should atleast work without needing any comabitility-mode and UAC-tweaks atleast. ![]() "I make so many mistakes. But then just think of all the mistakes I don't make, although I might." |
||
|
|
Highwire
Cruncher Joined: Aug 18, 2006 Post Count: 39 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Yes, I don't do any crunching outside of WCG, so was happy with existing 'classic' 32 bit client + given it seemed to work fine, didn't want to rock the boat especially on old os.
IF you start making 64 bit apps and this requires a 64 bit client, and the performance goes up by a significant bit, I may well go that route then. But that's for the future. I'm just happy I'd solved it. This way we **KNOW** what caused it - if I'd just re-installed under W7, assuming it worked and *overwrote* the shortcut, we'd never know, and the unwitting and false assumption would be 'old client bad new client good'. Also knowing compat mode can have very wierd side effects is something to bear in mind. The thing is, there's always chance to minimise chance of losing state, I'd have installed (upgraded) any newer 32 bit client onto the OLD OS and kept the shortcut, just booted into W7 to test :) Anyway, looking good, FAAH task @ 75% / 3:43. (I knew I'd fixed it by looking at the current HFCC tasks). |
||
|
|
Hypernova
Master Cruncher Audaces Fortuna Juvat ! Vaud - Switzerland Joined: Dec 16, 2008 Post Count: 1908 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I have the 64bit version installed on all my planets (sorry devices
---------------------------------------- ), that I downloaded from BOINC Berkley site. It is the 6.10.18 version.Have used it for all projects, works like a dream and never had problems. I have W7 64bit so it seemed to me logical to go that way, so that if 64 bit applications do appear in the future even for WCG I need nothing to change, and should not loose even a hartbeat. A heartbeat lost is points, lost, runtime lost, results lost. Simply unacceptable ![]() ![]() |
||
|
|
Highwire
Cruncher Joined: Aug 18, 2006 Post Count: 39 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Hypernova, yes, if this was a clean install I'd have just downloaded latest and greatest, and probably sniffed around 64 bit. But this was a case of installing W7 to a free partition I'd left 'in case' on an existing machine and just pointing a shortcut at the exe + ongoing work que. I never DREAMED it would cause this much headache!
|
||
|
|
|