| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 8
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Low key, crunch crunch crunch, we passed the 100,000,000 validated results mark Saturday afternoon, November 28, 2009.
----------------------------------------Digging back in the forums on the grid side processing: - The project launched 4 years ago using the UD agent on November 21, 2005. Single core is all it could do. - On January 23, 2006 a member cried out BOINC - It's Here which is when we started on init distribution of 4, quorum 3. - Then, later in 2006 the project got a speed up switching to init distribution 3, quorum 2 (if memory serves me right) - In August 2007 there was a transition to upgrade AutoDock to the present version - Same time as the science upgrade, the distribution became just same as quorum flat 2 and only make up jobs were send out to replace late and broken results. - Finally, Zero Redundancy, single distribution was introduced in 2008 and the efficiency became near 4 fold from what it was 4 years ago... not to speak of the big change of P3/P4 PC's which many upgraded to duo's quads, some starting to run sextuplets, octo's and even reading of 12, 16, and 24 core PC's kindly financed, maintained and run by dedicated members. And what's on the board... more experiments I'm sure, the current number 31 looking to be hefty, and a studied possibility to upgrade AutoDock in 2010... more atoms(?), simultaneous dockings (?), multithreading (?)... I don't know, but something to look forward to and telling... The HIV monster is out there, much there's to do to muzzle it permanently, so let's continue what we do best from our side: Crunch like there's no tomorrow. edit: oh and shame on me not mentioning... It's World AIDS day today. See JP's thread: https://secure.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewthread_thread,28066
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 2 times, last edit by Sekerob at Dec 1, 2009 8:07:04 PM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Crunch Crunch Crunch Crunch Crunch ![]() |
||
|
|
Bearcat
Master Cruncher USA Joined: Jan 6, 2007 Post Count: 2803 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Great milestone. Crunch crunch crunch. My 2 octo's are hungry so bring on more!
----------------------------------------![]()
Crunching for humanity since 2007!
![]() |
||
|
|
roundup
Veteran Cruncher Switzerland Joined: Jul 25, 2006 Post Count: 843 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Sekerob,
thanks for this very interesting FAAH history lesson. I am looking forward to further developments and I really wish that we contribute to eradicate this HIV bug. |
||
|
|
KodeX
Advanced Cruncher Germany Joined: Aug 17, 2006 Post Count: 96 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Lets see if we can crunch the next 100,000,000 within one year.
![]() |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7846 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Lets see if we can crunch the next 100,000,000 within one year. ![]() A nice laudable goal, but it would involve doing a little more than 4 times the present daily average every day. Certainly attainable if the power of the grid increases dramatically, especially with the new processors to hit the market in early 2010 or if there is a surge in new members. The next question would be: Do the researchers possess the capacity to process 4 times more results per day ? Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
Billyleen
Cruncher Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 2 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
congratulations, im glad that in a small way i have helped
|
||
|
|
martin64
Senior Cruncher Germany Joined: May 11, 2009 Post Count: 445 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Lets see if we can crunch the next 100,000,000 within one year. ![]() A nice laudable goal, but it would involve doing a little more than 4 times the present daily average every day. Certainly attainable if the power of the grid increases dramatically, especially with the new processors to hit the market in early 2010 or if there is a surge in new members. Only the second of your points will do. If the processing power per processor increases, the average duration of a WU will go down, and the techs will create larger WUs. So the number of results finished with a certain amount of machines should stay about the same, no matter how powerful they are. Of course, more powerful processors will help getting the work done faster, because larger WUs will also mean less WUs per experiment. Regards, Martin ![]() |
||
|
|
|