Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 8
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 2155 times and has 7 replies Next Thread
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
applause 100 Million Results validated for FightAIDS@Home

Low key, crunch crunch crunch, we passed the 100,000,000 validated results mark Saturday afternoon, November 28, 2009.

Digging back in the forums on the grid side processing:

- The project launched 4 years ago using the UD agent on November 21, 2005. Single core is all it could do.

- On January 23, 2006 a member cried out BOINC - It's Here which is when we started on init distribution of 4, quorum 3.

- Then, later in 2006 the project got a speed up switching to init distribution 3, quorum 2 (if memory serves me right)

- In August 2007 there was a transition to upgrade AutoDock to the present version

- Same time as the science upgrade, the distribution became just same as quorum flat 2 and only make up jobs were send out to replace late and broken results.

- Finally, Zero Redundancy, single distribution was introduced in 2008 and the efficiency became near 4 fold from what it was 4 years ago... not to speak of the big change of P3/P4 PC's which many upgraded to duo's quads, some starting to run sextuplets, octo's and even reading of 12, 16, and 24 core PC's kindly financed, maintained and run by dedicated members.

And what's on the board... more experiments I'm sure, the current number 31 looking to be hefty, and a studied possibility to upgrade AutoDock in 2010... more atoms(?), simultaneous dockings (?), multithreading (?)... I don't know, but something to look forward to and telling... The HIV monster is out there, much there's to do to muzzle it permanently, so let's continue what we do best from our side:

Crunch like there's no tomorrow.

edit: oh and shame on me not mentioning... It's World AIDS day today. See JP's thread: https://secure.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewthread_thread,28066
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
----------------------------------------
[Edit 2 times, last edit by Sekerob at Dec 1, 2009 8:07:04 PM]
[Dec 1, 2009 11:22:31 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
applause Re: 100 Million Results validated for FightAIDS@Home

biggrin Crunch Crunch Crunch Crunch Crunch applause applause
[Dec 1, 2009 11:28:33 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Bearcat
Master Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 6, 2007
Post Count: 2803
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: 100 Million Results validated for FightAIDS@Home

Great milestone. Crunch crunch crunch. My 2 octo's are hungry so bring on more! applause
----------------------------------------
Crunching for humanity since 2007!

[Dec 4, 2009 4:16:31 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
roundup
Veteran Cruncher
Switzerland
Joined: Jul 25, 2006
Post Count: 843
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: 100 Million Results validated for FightAIDS@Home

Sekerob,
thanks for this very interesting FAAH history lesson.
I am looking forward to further developments and I really wish that we contribute to eradicate this HIV bug.
[Dec 4, 2009 8:34:42 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KodeX
Advanced Cruncher
Germany
Joined: Aug 17, 2006
Post Count: 96
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: 100 Million Results validated for FightAIDS@Home

Lets see if we can crunch the next 100,000,000 within one year. biggrin
[Dec 4, 2009 10:35:41 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7846
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: 100 Million Results validated for FightAIDS@Home

Lets see if we can crunch the next 100,000,000 within one year. biggrin


A nice laudable goal, but it would involve doing a little more than 4 times the present daily average every day. Certainly attainable if the power of the grid increases dramatically, especially with the new processors to hit the market in early 2010 or if there is a surge in new members. The next question would be: Do the researchers possess the capacity to process 4 times more results per day ?

Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Dec 5, 2009 1:52:46 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Billyleen
Cruncher
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 2
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: 100 Million Results validated for FightAIDS@Home

congratulations, im glad that in a small way i have helped
[Dec 13, 2009 8:15:16 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
martin64
Senior Cruncher
Germany
Joined: May 11, 2009
Post Count: 445
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: 100 Million Results validated for FightAIDS@Home

Lets see if we can crunch the next 100,000,000 within one year. biggrin


A nice laudable goal, but it would involve doing a little more than 4 times the present daily average every day. Certainly attainable if the power of the grid increases dramatically, especially with the new processors to hit the market in early 2010 or if there is a surge in new members.

Only the second of your points will do. If the processing power per processor increases, the average duration of a WU will go down, and the techs will create larger WUs. So the number of results finished with a certain amount of machines should stay about the same, no matter how powerful they are.

Of course, more powerful processors will help getting the work done faster, because larger WUs will also mean less WUs per experiment.

Regards,
Martin
----------------------------------------

[Dec 13, 2009 8:27:09 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread