Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 109
|
![]() |
Author |
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
One need only look at the Boinc project Collatz Conjecture. How reasonable is it that a project can have less than 1% of the number of Active Host computers than WCG yet generate 2.3X the number of credits as WCG. Even allowing for the possibility of that project having faster computers, it appears unbelievable that the project is reporting 557 Tflops using 5,500 computers while WCG is reporting 343 Tflops on 233,000 computers? With this example one is comparing cpu with gpu output. |
||
|
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor Normandy - France Joined: Jan 26, 2007 Post Count: 3715 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Credits don't cost WCG anything so a slight change in policy ..**.. would greatly increase the numbers crunching and doing this fantastic work. That would not cost anything but credibility. And you can be certain that grids which have already not hesitated to not follow Berkeley's recommendations on credit rates for attracting racers would not hesitate to push their rates again to stay ahead of that competition. So where would that end? Cheers. Jean. ** Have removed the irrelevant example. As Sekerob has already explained WCG points are derived from BOINC credits, not the opposite. |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
So the real question is how to help those who covert BOINC points rather than worthiness to mankind to donate time to WCG? The BOINC points are seen as a competitive aspect for teams trying to out do other teams and is a real motivational force that drives decision making among crunchers. Personally I see it for example as how well I am doing, so trying to make the top 50 in my country for example.
It looks like BOINC are in the process of addressing this already so perhaps a wait and see? |
||
|
crille1006
Advanced Cruncher Germany Joined: Aug 15, 2007 Post Count: 79 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes.
----------------------------------------It must be handled with a BOINC-wide approach and it can't be an option, that WCG participates in inflation by giving users more credits for the same work. The question is: When will the new credit system be implemented? Best regards from Germany crille |
||
|
nasher
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Dec 2, 2005 Post Count: 1423 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
yes it sucks that WCG is a low score for points in BOINC world... honestly that is why my WCG is so low compaired to the rest of the projects (that i have mostly stoped) for a while i was doing the but this one gives x times more credit than this other one mabey i should crunch that one...
----------------------------------------since then i have determined that i want to work on WCG and help cure some of these diseases hopefully soon give it another year and my WCG should be looking close on my graphs to what i want it to be ![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I crunch here and at Collatz, (and a bit at gpugrid).
I sense some disdain at the fact that people devote their computational resources to non-disease related sections. Honestly, it is an elitist thing to assume that WCG contributes to humanity and also in a somewhat underhanded manner imply Collatz is a waste of resources. Collatz is a very elegant app, and it is very efficient. It might not be applicable to some disease but it is exact. These are not models and simulations, this is pure number theoretic operation. The project returns very little data per result (a hundred bytes or so), but the data is exceptionally easy to read and assimilate. One might argue that understanding this mathematical conjecture is less important than proteins and such, but honestly, given the massive amount of computer power brought to bear on these projects, I think we have enough to spare. Also, as has been stated the reason Collatz has so much processing power is their GPU app. I have 3 teraflops of power between 3 relatively inexpensive cards. If WCG had GPU apps, they would certainly gain a ton of processing power. This is largely the reason Folding is as successful a project as it is. They have amazing apps for CPU, ATI, NIVIDIA, and PS3. They reach everyone who wants to crunch. |
||
|
damir1978
Senior Cruncher Joined: Apr 16, 2007 Post Count: 397 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Right! More effort should be put in GPU app at WCG.
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
KerSamson
Master Cruncher Switzerland Joined: Jan 29, 2007 Post Count: 1679 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Dear CLST,
----------------------------------------I don't have the feeling that the WCG Community does have any disdain for the resolution of mathematical problems. For my-self, I try to respect every kind of engagement even if, sometime, I am not really convinced about the importance of some projects ! ... Regarding the resolution of mathematical problems (collatz, prime number, etc.), I am sure that we face to questions which have a significant impact on the way we will understand the world in some years (5, 25, 100, 500?). I would not say that everything - including in life science - is mathematical. However we have to recognize how much mathematics do help us to understand, to describe, and to modelize complex life science and physical phenomenons (e.g. climate prediction, modeling of ocean streams). Regarding the current evolution of GPU, I can imagine that scientists (the final decision does not come from WCG) will have to decide quickly about the pertinence of considering GPU-based computation or not. Thank you for your participation. Cheers, Yves |
||
|
Hypernova
Master Cruncher Audaces Fortuna Juvat ! Vaud - Switzerland Joined: Dec 16, 2008 Post Count: 1908 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Just to set the point for myself, I crunch for what I believe is of the most benefit to humanity.
----------------------------------------Points are a side effect that allows us to set a metric and between members to create a sense of reward, competition, recognition, which are important elements for the individuals of our society, but also make the whole thing more fun and motivating. Having fun, be motivated to give and be useful for the humanity all at the same time that is what I would call: perfection. Points, badges, certificates are ok as long as we do not forget what they should be: virtual.The only real concrete thing is the result of the computation. And that is what we really give for free. The scientist who receive the results, they have a huge responsibility to make the best use of them, and mainly because they get them for free. ![]() |
||
|
sk..
Master Cruncher http://s17.rimg.info/ccb5d62bd3e856cc0d1df9b0ee2f7f6a.gif Joined: Mar 22, 2007 Post Count: 2324 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Most people are probably here for the projects offered by the WCG team and the management of the projects. It is well run.
----------------------------------------Many of the other projects that I am involved in are similar to the projects here in terms of the research, for example malariacontrol, docking@home, rosetta. So the WCG is ideologically close to my way of thinking. That said I still chip in with some support for other projects that I feel are important that are a bit different to anything the WCG presently offers, such as climate prediction, milkyway and Einstein. I actually prefer that these are run by different teams and hope it stays that way. I am happy enough to mostly crunch GPUGrid tasks on my NVidia cards, and use most of my CPUs time crunching for WCG. The nearest thing to the WCG might be docking or ibercivis, as these research teams run several projects at once, though they dont have badge systems. It would be better if the WCG and entire Boinc collective used the same standardised point systems and perhaps badge systems for all projects. There are some that crunch Boinc Projects solely for the points, no matter what the project is! [Edit 2 times, last edit by skgiven at Dec 23, 2009 11:02:35 AM] |
||
|
|
![]() |