Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 50
Posts: 50   Pages: 5   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 12013 times and has 49 replies Next Thread
Movieman
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: Sep 9, 2006
Post Count: 1042
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: "Monster" Wus ?

Hey Jean,
I saw one last night take 24 hours and that was on my westmere rig. No biggie, just thought I'd bring it up.
Really surprised me to see the time as thats a pretty decent machine.
All it does is HCCC and it's dedicated, does nothing else..
----------------------------------------

[Nov 19, 2009 12:15:31 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: "Monster" Wus ?

I have one that will probably take 24-26hrs on a P4 2.8Ghz, and have had 2 previous WUs take about 18hrs on that machine.

They seem to be running at around 6-8hrs on an older Celeron....

It's no big deal, and both machines are only running HFCC.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Nov 19, 2009 7:39:08 PM]
[Nov 19, 2009 7:38:29 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
adrianxw
Senior Cruncher
Denmark
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Post Count: 196
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: "Monster" Wus ?

HFCC_s1_00836404_s1_0000_0 is also a biggy. 16 hours crunched on it and 62% done!

Several wu's recently have been "longer" without really raising my eyebrow. All seem to finish okay though, so no problem.

<edit>
Finished in 25 hours. No HT on that system.
</edit>
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by adrianxw at Dec 2, 2009 7:45:58 PM]
[Dec 1, 2009 11:06:28 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: "Monster" Wus ?

The longest I've seen myself on the quad, 64 bit OS / Client was well over 9.5 hours. The duo, on low hertz, did one of 16 hours.

Though you know you know that they will finish, when not used to them they become little nail clippers... but BOINC and the science have safeties/checkpoints, so even if your e-co pulls the power, the science will in 99.9999% of the cases resume from the last saved progress point upon power-up.

smile
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Dec 1, 2009 11:28:32 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
smeyer55
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Feb 15, 2009
Post Count: 303
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: "Monster" Wus ?

My longest one on a 2.8GHz Celeron took a little over 42 hours.
On my 2.66GHz Hyperthreaded i7 I've had some in the 16-17 hour range which is about 3 times what the "typical" WU takes.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by smeyer55 at Dec 1, 2009 5:28:05 PM]
[Dec 1, 2009 5:26:44 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: "Monster" Wus ?

Next time you see one, check the affinity. It's likely those are running on the virtual cores rather than the physical. Can't remember anyone posting this but suspect very wide ranges of runtimes on the HT machine, that is if W7 is not rotating the processes from one core to the next.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Dec 1, 2009 5:38:20 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
kskjold
Senior Cruncher
Norway
Joined: May 20, 2008
Post Count: 469
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: "Monster" Wus ?

My sons computer is a Dell P4 with intel M processor. And his WU has now been running for 8 hours and has only completed 16%. And Sekerob, thats not an HT processor.....:)
----------------------------------------
[Dec 1, 2009 6:40:45 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
smeyer55
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Feb 15, 2009
Post Count: 303
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: "Monster" Wus ?

I've got 4 on two Xeon 5130 dual cores that are looking to come in around 21, 18, 24, and 20 hours. "Normal" times are 6-7 hours. Using XP 32 bit and no hyperthreading.
[Dec 2, 2009 4:59:39 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
nasher
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Dec 2, 2005
Post Count: 1423
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: "Monster" Wus ?

past few days i have noticed that the WU times for HFCC have more than dubbled for what i have been seing (some of these have gone longer that 40 hours) ... if i wasnt so close to a badge rank change i would probaly turn this off till its solved
----------------------------------------

[Dec 3, 2009 7:04:59 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Nevada Bob
Senior Cruncher
USA
Joined: Dec 8, 2008
Post Count: 174
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: "Monster" Wus ?

I also have been getting some monster sized Work Units.

One 2.4GHz Machine ran HFCC_s1_00838197_ s1_0001_ 0 for 50.31 hours

I'm running another HFCC that originally said 37 hours but has now worked it's way down to 32 hours for completion on a P4 3.4Ghz machine.

I think this is a bit excessive.
[Dec 3, 2009 7:08:26 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 50   Pages: 5   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread