Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 7
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 7698 times and has 6 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Lack of requirements listings on the download page

For linux, the current recommended version is 6.2.15. The one linked to does not work under Debian 3.0 (2.4 kernel). 6.2.1 does work in that environment. At some time between the two, the requirements have been changed.

It would make sense to specify the minimum requirements on the download page, so that users don't waste their time downloading something useless.

It would be best if the web site provided several links (e.g. to the suggested version for 2.4 kernels and the suggested version for 2.6 kernels), preferably with library dependencies listed.
[Jul 16, 2009 5:19:10 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Lack of requirements listings on the download page

The only tested version is the one for Ubuntu Linux and that's the one you can download from Berkeley, where all WCG links go to for the various packages.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Jul 16, 2009 7:06:58 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Lack of requirements listings on the download page

Rioght above the system requirements clause is a paragraph which says:
I have installed the recommend version of the BOINC client for Linux, but I cannot get it to run. What should I do?
Which version of the Linux client you should use depends highly on the libraries that you have installed on your machine. The recommended version is what you should try first. However, if this does not work, then you should try one of the 'compatible' builds. You may find these here. The compatible builds are command line only.
Display similar help items

Link: http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/help/viewSearch.do?searchString=linux
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Jul 16, 2009 7:57:10 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Lack of requirements listings on the download page

http://www.debian.org/releases/

Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 (woody) — obsolete stable release
[Jul 16, 2009 10:39:51 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Lack of requirements listings on the download page

However, if this does not work, then you should try one of the 'compatible' builds. You may find these here. The compatible builds are command line only.

Have you looked at what that link leads to? A page which lists only 2 versions, 6.6.36 and 6.4.5, both of which are more recent that WCG recommends!

There are often comments about encouraging users to contribute to WCG, yet WCG fails to document even the simplest of things, putting all the onus on the user to go and find the relevant version for themselves. As you quoted: "Which version of the Linux client you should use depends highly on the libraries that you have installed on your machine." But all you'd have to do is list the library dependencies on the install page and the issue would go away, which is why I suggested it.

I'm quite happy with my current versions and the time wasted on downloading a new one is no big deal, but this site is set up in pretty much the best way possible to alienate new users and make things hard for them. Why makes things 100 times harder for users when you could make it dead simple by having a dependency list just like you find on a download page for, say, debian packages?
[Jul 17, 2009 12:14:47 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Lack of requirements listings on the download page

Want to join the group of the 0.2% of the 0.2% of the 0.2% of the volunteers that actually do generate wiki's, faq's, help articles and make such a dependency list? You are most welcome, Kremmen.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Jul 17, 2009 12:35:15 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Lack of requirements listings on the download page

Here's a wiki link to a page on various Linux installs contributed and augmented by a number of volunteers: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/wiki/Installing_on_Linux.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Jul 17, 2009 12:41:42 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread