Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go ยป
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 5
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1109 times and has 4 replies Next Thread
nanoprobe
Master Cruncher
Classified
Joined: Aug 29, 2008
Post Count: 2998
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Large difference in completion times.

I switched my P4 3.0 HT box from HCMD2 to HFCC and I noticed there is big difference in the time it takes to complete HFCC WU's when compared to my dual core boxes running HFCC. When they were both running HCMD2 the completion times were pretty close. The dual cores complete HFCC WU's in about 6 hours but the P4 box is only 22% complete after 9+ hours. Is this normal? I'm running version 6.2.28.
----------------------------------------
In 1969 I took an oath to defend and protect the U S Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Domestic. There was no expiration date.


[Jun 21, 2009 2:55:27 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Large difference in completion times.

Hello nanoprobe,
You can select Statistics - By Projects and then select each project to see how long it took to run an average work unit Yesterday. Sounds like your HFCC unit is bigger than average.

Lawrence
[Jun 21, 2009 10:13:20 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
nanoprobe
Master Cruncher
Classified
Joined: Aug 29, 2008
Post Count: 2998
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Large difference in completion times.

Hello nanoprobe,
You can select Statistics - By Projects and then select each project to see how long it took to run an average work unit Yesterday. Sounds like your HFCC unit is bigger than average.

Lawrence


The times have been going up steady only on the P4 box. The other 3 crunchers I oversee are dual cores and have been running HFCC without any noticeable increase in crunch times. No biggy but it is weird. 12 hours and only 30% and 27% done respectively when the others knock them out completely in 5-6 hours.
----------------------------------------
In 1969 I took an oath to defend and protect the U S Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Domestic. There was no expiration date.


[Jun 21, 2009 11:49:38 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7745
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Large difference in completion times.

I have several P4 boxes at 1.5 and 1.6 ghz. They complete a HFCC unit in the 15 to 20 hour range. Your box should be faster.

Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Jun 22, 2009 12:22:58 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Large difference in completion times.

My Pentium 4 2.8ghz finishes one workunit in ~10-14hr.

My Core2Quad finishes 4 workunit in ~2:30. :)

Talk about breakthrough. I wonder what performance i7 could get..
[Jun 23, 2009 7:28:43 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread