Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 5
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1300 times and has 4 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
biggrin Work units suitable for a low-end system? [RESOLVED]

Hello, just added a PIII type processor w/ 512MB RAM to my "arsenal" laughing, I've tried a few searches for "short work units" and the like to see if I could find a WCG project that my computer is capable of actually completing work units in...

Basically, is there a list somewhere which basically gives you a rough idea of which WCG tend to be fastest? I know this incredibly general but I thought I might as well try and see what you guys thought... So far I've heard the RICE project isn't very intensive, so I'm running that, but any tips for other projects?

Thanks for any input!
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by TKH at Jun 11, 2009 11:56:38 AM]
[Jun 9, 2009 2:23:05 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Work units suitable for a low-end system?

Short we have, HCMD2. They are presently defaulting to running 4 CPU hours, the rare one longer, many shorter. RICE is guaranteed 7 hours, does not matter how fast the machine, always 7 hours.

PS, you don't tell what OS. HCMD2 on Linux can run veeeery long for unknown reason to me. On Windows they do well.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Jun 9, 2009 2:28:20 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Work units suitable for a low-end system?

Yeah it's a Windows XP box I'm using.

Verrrrrrrrry slow!
[Jun 9, 2009 2:33:18 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Work units suitable for a low-end system?

There's The Matrix in the Start Here FAQ's if looking for a 1 page overview.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Jun 9, 2009 2:34:37 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Work units suitable for a low-end system?

Brilliant! Thank you very much! Exactly what I was looking for. laughing

I'll be going for RICE, HCC, and HCMD2 if you were wondering :)
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Jun 9, 2009 2:41:37 PM]
[Jun 9, 2009 2:37:37 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread