| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Help Fight Childhood Cancer Project Forum
Thread: Inconclusive |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 24
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
This morning I checked the workunits I completed since yesterday's project launch on the my results page, only to see they have all been marked as inconclusive.
Now I know this is not something to worry about. Wingman workunits have been send out to validate my results. I assume they'll confirm my results (if not there is another problem) and all will be fine. However I was surprised to see this mass inconclusiveness. (as opposed to the random ones I sometimes see) I'll report back on the outcome once the wingman workunits are in. |
|||
|
||||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
You've been the target of a random device check. Should not last beyond 8-15 results. Had it with FAAH when off-line for a month. Each time a dubious result is returned (aborts of work in progress e.g.), the device is drafted for an in-depth physical ;>)
----------------------------------------
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
zombie67 [MM]
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: May 26, 2006 Post Count: 228 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
All the HFCC results returned by my two PPC/OSX machines are being marked inconclusive. Not so for my Intel/OSX machines. It's odd, because the PPC machines have not aborted any WUs. In fact, they haven't crunched any WUs in quite some time since there is no PPC app for Clean Energy.
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
That's in line with what I said above. Reliability ratings expire.
----------------------------------------
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
zombie67 [MM]
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: May 26, 2006 Post Count: 228 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Reliability ratings expire. Ah. Good to know. How many good results are required to acquire a rating of "reliable"? |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hello zombie67,
Sekerob says: "Should not last beyond 8-15 results." This is the sort of finicky detail that knreed will cheerfully adjust without posting a notice of change. When we first started the 'reliable' list, I think that it took 15 results to get on it. I simply do not know what the current value is. Lawrence |
||
|
|
rilian
Veteran Cruncher Ukraine - we rule! Joined: Jun 17, 2007 Post Count: 1459 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Got inconclusive on a wcg-running 24/7/366 intel/win32 non-overclocked machine :)
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
zombie67 [MM]
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: May 26, 2006 Post Count: 228 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Got inconclusive on a wcg-running 24/7/366 intel/win32 non-overclocked machine :) Clearly, you are not to be trusted!  |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
The first of my inconclusives had its wingman workunit come in and validated. I'm in my way back to being reliable again.
 |
||
|
|
ALAIN_13013
Advanced Cruncher France Joined: Nov 28, 2006 Post Count: 83 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I did not have a problem with this project. Neither on my machines Windows nor Linux.
---------------------------------------- |
|||
|
||||
|
|