Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 44
Posts: 44   Pages: 5   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 29721 times and has 43 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Work Unit Information

here, for comparison, is what my Q6600 is spitting out;

HFCC_ 00005617_ TrkB_ 0001_ 0-- Valid 3/13/09 22:42:51 3/14/09 01:03:57 1.76 38.9 / 43.0
HFCC_ 00006242_ TrkB_ 0002_ 0-- Valid 3/13/09 19:29:46 3/13/09 22:00:41 1.67 36.8 / 32.5
[Mar 14, 2009 12:57:20 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Work Unit Information

Haven't seen it posted anywhere else, but if I missed it, my bad.
Has anyone seen the approximate download/upload sizes for the HFCC workunits?
[Mar 14, 2009 11:12:12 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Work Unit Information

Me neither, but I wrote some values down somewhere for later in The Matrix. The value I have not recorded was the one time science software. Given we're on the temporary shorts, not definitive on how the 6 hour mean tasks will size up.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Mar 14, 2009 11:20:15 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor
Normandy - France
Joined: Jan 26, 2007
Post Count: 3716
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Work Unit Information

I have blocked Network Activity in BoincMgr to see the set of files returned for a HFCC WU:
4 files, 6.12 kB, 39.96 kB, 1.45 kB and 486 bytes.
Not that much.
And it was a long one, 2.5 times longer than the average, if that matters.

On the download side I find either 10 files per WU, totalling 258 kB, or 13 files per WU totalling from 337 to 400 kB.

Cheers. Jean.
----------------------------------------
Team--> Decrypthon -->Statistics/Join -->Thread
[Mar 15, 2009 2:52:29 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor
Normandy - France
Joined: Jan 26, 2007
Post Count: 3716
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Work Unit Information

The batches of work after this will be split up into work units about 6 hours of runtime length. These batches will have the normal 9 days deadline as mentioned above. Here are the list of batches with 6 hour average runtime estimates:
HFCC_0001*
HFCC_0002*
HFCC_t1_00*
.....etc.....

Thanks,
-Uplinger

My quad has started to crunch three of these normal 9-day WUs, and if one of those three should be in the average 6 hour scheme the two others have more a CEP type A profile for their projected runtime: 8 and 11 hours compared to 3.75 hours for a HCC in the same machine. And with about the same duration estimate setting as the 4-day WUs, so the Duration Correction Factor should jump to the sky once more when they finish. sad

Cheers. Jean.
----------------------------------------
Team--> Decrypthon -->Statistics/Join -->Thread
[Mar 15, 2009 5:57:02 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
bieberj
Senior Cruncher
United States
Joined: Dec 2, 2004
Post Count: 406
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Work Unit Information

Proof that one of the tasks was not properly cut in 3 hours blocks. I am not complaining, just making a point.

HFCC_ 00003065_ TrkB_ 0001_ 0-- Valid 3/14/09 11:32:30 3/15/09 04:29:55 3.15 36.7 / 36.3
HFCC_ 00003000_ TrkB_ 0000_ 0-- Valid 3/13/09 21:34:49 3/15/09 03:42:09 13.89 162.0 / 156.6
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by bieberj at Mar 15, 2009 2:08:29 PM]
[Mar 15, 2009 2:07:18 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Work Unit Information

Proof that one of the tasks was not properly cut in 3 hours blocks. I am not complaining, just making a point.

Uplinger stated that the average of a WU is around 3 hours, not that it is cut on 3 hours, so a WU can be longer and shorter.
[Mar 15, 2009 7:39:29 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
rilian
Veteran Cruncher
Ukraine - we rule!
Joined: Jun 17, 2007
Post Count: 1460
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Work Unit Information

how about this one:

HFCC_ 00006531_ TrkB_ 0000_ 0-- Valid 3/14/09 06:01:37 3/15/09 12:28:05 29.55 233.6 / 215.3


it is 2.0Ghz Xeon, win32
----------------------------------------
[Mar 15, 2009 7:54:32 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Work Unit Information

The project mean for the first 31,000 work units is 2.876 hours. Close enough. And yes, they are quite variable. Comes with the territory of non-deterministic computing.


----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Mar 15, 2009 8:03:09 PM]
[Mar 15, 2009 8:00:58 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Work Unit Information

I've only done a few of the short deadline jobs, which obviously jumped the queue and ran at high priority on my old quad with 32 bit XP.

HFCC_ 00002600_ TrkB_ 0005_ 0-- Valid 14/03/09 17:44:16 14/03/09 19:41:56 1.67 39.0 / 37.1
HFCC_ 00000868_ TrkB_ 0003_ 0-- Valid 14/03/09 14:05:28 14/03/09 17:44:37 1.58 36.9 / 35.7
HFCC_ 00007549_ TrkB_ 0007_ 0-- Valid 14/03/09 09:53:05 14/03/09 11:46:09 1.37 32.0 / 34.0
HFCC_ 00008190_ TrkB_ 0002_ 0-- Valid 14/03/09 02:58:57 14/03/09 05:39:56 2.00 46.8 / 43.1
HFCC_ 00007740_ TrkB_ 0005_ 0-- Valid 14/03/09 02:55:30 14/03/09 05:39:56 1.64 38.3 / 38.6
HFCC_ 00001050_ TrkB_ 0003_ 0-- Valid 14/03/09 00:28:23 14/03/09 02:56:04 1.69 39.5 / 37.0
HFCC_ 00003410_ TrkB_ 0005_ 0-- Valid 13/03/09 18:09:40 14/03/09 00:27:15 1.77 41.3 / 40.2

I have 3 of the longer deadline jobs in the Queue, which will take a day or so to reach after the HCC and Rice jobs. Just going to take an assortment of HFCC, HCC and Rice at random for a wee while.
[Mar 15, 2009 8:29:53 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 44   Pages: 5   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread