Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 3
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1131 times and has 2 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Smaller work units for older systems

I am using two systems: a fairly new one with an Intel Core Duo 2.4GHz and an older on with an AMD Athlon .
The older one receives the same size of work units as the newer one, which leads to not meeting the deadline for the delivery of the work unit because this PC doesn't run 8 hours a day (in fact I switch it on 2-3 times a week for about one hour). Working on units I won't get credit for (and which will be distributed to others again) doesn't make sense so I am going to stop WCG on that system. If I could select to receive smaller units which can be completed in about 1 hour instead of 12-15 hours that system could participate and provide value for WCG. Even if it's a small one, I assume there are more people like me and it would finally add up to something that makes a difference. Selecting the size (=time needed) of work units should be configurable per system, because for one system it makes sense to receive larger amounts if is switched on for a longer time and for others it makes sense to receive smaller amounts.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Feb 14, 2009 12:14:35 AM]
[Feb 14, 2009 12:13:32 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Smaller work units for older systems

You should try making a new profile for the older machine and select only the Nutritious Rice project. They run at 10 hours regardless of the system. It gets as much done as it can and then reports after 10 hours.
And actually the techs announced recently that the jobs were going to be 6 hours crunch time. So that project would probably be your best bet.
[Feb 14, 2009 12:19:44 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Smaller work units for older systems

A look into the future discussed in other threads [test your search skills for posts by knreed] is to develop an function for the work generators & feeders to dynamically and automatically cut and assign "work according device crunching power". A supplemental option to go with that, if feasible, is to provide a device profile setting to express the preference to receive in augmentation to the automatic function shorter, normal, longer work units... and no, not "per project". There's a limit to what's practical, no limit to our dreams.

Both these functions require BOINC server software development wish has only been done in outline, so it is still a very long way away... 2010, maybe. Generally, all but CEP jobs are now set to run on a project average of 6 hours, with the exception of RICE where the newest batches have a fixed 6 hour run time irrespective the power of the device.

If you look in the support FAQ's, see link below, there's a project resource matrix, but monitoring the project graphs, see link below, provides a more up to date view of how job durations are currently averaging.

cheers
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Feb 15, 2009 10:20:13 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread