Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 4
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1599 times and has 3 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
ouch

E000203_ 320A_ 001759004_ 0-- TheBouchers-lap Too Late 1/20/09 07:31:46 1/23/09 19:56:27 11.46 128.8 / 0.0
E000202_ 888A_ 00174y00y_ 0-- buddy Too Late 1/20/09 06:42:42 1/23/09 20:03:53 38.96 466.6 / 0.0
[Jan 25, 2009 7:52:43 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: ouch

E000208_ 400A_ 001c2s002_ 0-- an8-32x Invalid 1/20/09 16:28:12 1/21/09 07:10:43 6.73 115.8 / 115.8
[Jan 25, 2009 7:54:34 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: ouch

Here's one I just noticed from my results status:
Result Name Status Sent Time Time Due /
Return Time CPU Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit
E000115_ 592A_ 000j5k00e_ 3-- Invalid 1/27/09 20:22:15 1/29/09 17:44:57 34.35 276.2 / 276.2
E000115_ 592A_ 000j5k00e_ 2-- Valid 1/23/09 17:04:21 1/28/09 14:28:31 89.95 1,040.5 / 479.0 <-- mine
E000115_ 592A_ 000j5k00e_ 0-- Invalid 1/10/09 12:08:49 1/11/09 15:55:24 15.49 261.2 / 261.2
E000115_ 592A_ 000j5k00e_ 1-- Valid 1/10/09 11:58:23 1/24/09 14:26:03 30.05 479.0 / 479.0
This isn't a machine that I regularly use so didn't notice. That's a whopper of a wu and a very different run time versus the others too. This is a C2D machine so I'm surprised it ran so long. I can pretty surely say that's the longest wu I have ever had go on one of my machines!
[Jan 31, 2009 11:51:53 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: ouch

If I get more than 1 CEP job in the queue, I suspend all but 1. Improves performance tremendously, and it causes work fetch to stop, so the queue has to be about 3 days to not run the risk of idle running cores.

On multi-cores best run combined with RICE or HCC. Even FAAH and HPF2 seem to cross effect CEP jobs due resource contention. Not tried combined with DDDT as they were not available at the time.

Just my tunnel viewed 2 Eurocent observations.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Feb 1, 2009 9:51:01 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread