| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: The Clean Energy Project Forum
Thread: [ERROR] Failed to open either source or destination files while copying wcgrestart.rst to ../../ |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 15
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Very possibly the routine works to give a credit per seed/attempt within a job?. 2-4 hours looks awfully awfully short.
----------------------------------------The log of a normal result does not provide any information that supports my speculation though. Here's a "healthy" log: <core_client_version>6.2.28</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> Calling initGraphics() INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning. ####Message = NORMAL STOP called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> Maybe the techs can spend a word or 2 on how this works exactly for CEP, but the error/fail and short ending does not read good. Today the project average runtime was over 11 hours per job.
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
Crystal Pellet
Veteran Cruncher Joined: May 21, 2008 Post Count: 1323 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
If you and CP please have a look in the Result Status pages and click the work unit name to see the other quorum results. 16.9 smells like 50% of credit which is what is given for an invalid result... the interest is the outcome of the other results... short too of course? Still waiting for my wing(wo)man, so "Pending Validation". My claim is 70.1 for 5.67h. In the mean time a second CEP version A task started on the same machine: 39min. 2.4 % |
||
|
|
rkclmbr4u
Cruncher Joined: Oct 23, 2007 Post Count: 6 Status: Offline |
If you and CP please have a look in the Result Status pages and click the work unit name to see the other quorum results. 16.9 smells like 50% of credit which is what is given for an invalid result... the interest is the outcome of the other results... short too of course? Here is the workunit status, seems two are in. mine was the 30.5-16.9 and the WU ran for 1.64h i believe Workunit Status Project Name: The Clean Energy Project Created: 12/5/08 Name: E000003_495A_00002b009 Minimum Quorum: 2 Initial Replication: 2 Result Name Status Sent Time Time Due / Return Time CPU Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit E000003_ 495A_ 00002b009_ 0-- Valid 12/6/08 21:26:52 12/7/08 16:21:14 1.64 30.5 / 16.9 E000003_ 495A_ 00002b009_ 1-- Valid 12/6/08 21:23:55 12/7/08 09:42:28 1.00 16.9 / 16.9 |
||
|
|
Finder
Cruncher Joined: Aug 20, 2007 Post Count: 1 Status: Offline |
I have another problem.
I was doing task E000001_134A_00000r000 and only had 8hrs left when it went back up to 66hrs the progress when back down to 0.200 from 66.00. I'm going to abort the work since I don't want to waste time if it does it again. |
||
|
|
Crystal Pellet
Veteran Cruncher Joined: May 21, 2008 Post Count: 1323 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
If you and CP please have a look in the Result Status pages and click the work unit name to see the other quorum results. 16.9 smells like 50% of credit which is what is given for an invalid result... the interest is the outcome of the other results... short too of course? Finally my wingman finished. Both valid with a similar runtime. Project Name: The Clean Energy Project Created: 5-12-08 Name: E000000_029A_00000000t Minimum Quorum: 2 Initial Replication: 2 E000000_ 029A_ 00000000t_ 1-- Valid 5-12-08 18:00:48 6-12-08 07:50:45 5.67 70.1 / 73.6 E000000_ 029A_ 00000000t_ 0-- Valid 5-12-08 17:50:20 8-12-08 00:58:07 5.49 77.1 / 73.6 Ciao |
||
|
|
|