| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: FightAIDS@Home
Thread: Status of long FAAH Work Units |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 16
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
There are only 25 of these mega workunits still running. Thanx for the information, Kneerd. My last one will finish in about 10 hrs., and I guess all others should be completed within the next 2 to 3 days. Is there already a schedule for the drain out, and the switch to single redundancy? Would be nice to double the capacity as soon as possible...  Cheers Totto |
||
|
|
bieberj
Senior Cruncher United States Joined: Dec 2, 2004 Post Count: 406 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Mine was returned just now... 51.27 hours of processing time.
That's the third one that it handled. |
||
|
|
petehardy
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: May 4, 2007 Post Count: 318 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I just got one validated:
----------------------------------------faah5017_ 1k6p_ 7hvp_ 00_ 2-- Valid 08/18/2008 09:18:10 08/21/2008 18:38:54 60.86 870.2 / 420.4 faah5017_ 1k6p_ 7hvp_ 00_ 1-- No Reply 07/30/2008 09:05:10 08/18/2008 09:05:10 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 faah5017_ 1k6p_ 7hvp_ 00_ 0-- Valid 07/30/2008 08:53:12 08/02/2008 03:58:58 44.82 420.4 / 420.4 The credit per hour really seems to get skewed by these long WUs. I hope we've seen the last of them   "Patience is a virtue", I can't wait to learn it! |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
It's a real riddle to me how a 60 hour client claims much more per hour than a 44 hour client, suggesting there was a performance issue or a poor benchmark or a 64 bit client with a high integer, but both running on the same platform.... Linux or Windows or Mac.
----------------------------------------With the zero redundancy you're on your own and are measured against a benchmark value that was determined during a large pool wide variety machine type beta. DDDT went up after the change by about 3 to 4 average per hour and have noticed that all other projects made virtually the same step change when that happened, so maybe something was learned from that 'reference' mini work unit.... knreed is always monitoring the algorithm to keep it as true as possible to the 100,000 cobblestone per 1 teraflop of operations but also to see if the sciences perform optimally in the broadest sense.
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Aug 21, 2008 7:23:02 PM] |
||
|
|
petehardy
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: May 4, 2007 Post Count: 318 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Here's a bunch of results (last 30 valid) from the same quad (AMD 9600 2.3):
----------------------------------------faah4326_ 001441_ MC_ xMut_ md01830_ 00_ 1--Valid 08/21/2008 02:32:57 08/21/2008 18:38:54 7.52 107.6 / 67.7 faah4324_ 001773_ MC_ xMut_ md01670_ 08_ 0--Valid 08/20/2008 03:44:30 08/20/2008 17:28:34 4.89 68.4 / 61.8 faah4271_ Acetasemide2_ MIN_ xmd18370_ 00_ 2--Valid 08/19/2008 12:35:43 08/20/2008 01:53:13 5.52 76.4 / 56.5 faah4322_ 001581_ MC_ xMut_ md01430_ 04_ 0--Valid 08/19/2008 07:39:39 08/20/2008 00:56:16 3.79 53.2 / 40.9 faah4318_ 001467_ MC_ xMut_ md00740_ 05_ 2--Valid 08/18/2008 01:54:32 08/18/2008 16:53:40 6.13 83.2 / 76.1 faah5017_ 1k6p_ 7hvp_ 00_ 2--Valid 08/18/2008 09:18:10 08/21/2008 18:38:54 60.86 870.2 / 420.4 faah4319_ 000870_ MC_ xMut_ md00800_ 04_ 1--Valid 08/17/2008 22:35:43 08/18/2008 11:16:45 4.17 58.0 / 36.8 faah4319_ 000321_ MC_ xMut_ md00800_ 03_ 1--Valid 08/17/2008 21:24:32 08/18/2008 09:18:10 5.40 75.2 / 59.9 faah4319_ 001430_ MC_ xMut_ md00800_ 03_ 1--Valid 08/17/2008 14:41:54 08/18/2008 03:51:47 3.86 53.7 / 31.8 X0000050290297200506162203_ 0-- Valid 08/21/2008 00:59:41 08/21/2008 15:07:40 6.95 99.2 / 102.3 X0000050201126200506031340_ 2--Valid 08/20/2008 07:39:19 08/21/2008 00:59:40 6.96 99.3 / 94.0 X0000050250566200506021040_ 0--Valid 08/20/2008 00:56:16 08/20/2008 17:28:34 6.63 92.8 / 86.1 X0000050230978200506171934_ 0--Valid 08/19/2008 15:33:12 08/20/2008 07:39:18 6.80 97.3 / 73.9 X0000050160492200506171644_ 1--Valid 08/18/2008 11:16:45 08/19/2008 02:44:19 6.74 94.9 / 86.1 X0000050130712200506021310_ 1--Valid 08/17/2008 16:21:20 08/18/2008 09:18:10 6.89 95.9 / 76.3 dddt0602l0704_ 100713_ 1--Valid 08/20/2008 01:53:13 08/21/2008 00:59:40 10.98 156.4 / 100.2 dddt0602l0701_ 100799_ 1--Valid 08/19/2008 13:29:00 08/20/2008 07:39:18 8.35 119.4 / 70.1 dddt0602l0699_ 100650_ 0--Valid 08/18/2008 20:06:19 08/19/2008 15:33:12 9.81 139.3 / 108.0 dddt0602l0680_ 100172_ 0--Valid 08/17/2008 11:22:53 08/18/2008 09:18:10 10.71 149.1 / 122.3 lw419_ 00043_ 15--Valid 08/19/2008 18:03:42 08/20/2008 08:44:22 5.58 77.8 / 70.2 lw382_ 00003_ 19--Valid 08/18/2008 16:53:40 08/19/2008 12:35:42 8.25 117.1 / 95.7 lw356_ 00023_ 7--Valid 08/17/2008 23:26:01 08/18/2008 16:53:40 7.50 101.9 / 93.1 lw341_ 00013_ 3--Valid 08/17/2008 16:22:31 08/18/2008 09:18:10 8.38 116.6 / 102.7 R00087_ 2856abf69c7817bdca3abc526552f347_ 01_ 000_ 13--Valid 08/20/2008 18:14:49 08/21/2008 15:07:40 8.01 114.3 / 95.8 R00084_ 31efd01f49f850a1d1d5e6f6d28b13b8_ 03_ 003_ 16--Valid 08/19/2008 06:29:24 08/20/2008 00:56:16 8.01 112.4 / 82.2 R00084_ 0da1a5e9ec8f4c28593a7c0819190959_ 02_ 006_ 18--Valid 08/19/2008 04:41:58 08/20/2008 00:56:16 8.00 112.3 / 80.0 R00083_ b3ed3098b7bc47f691b971caf5ea894d_ 02_ 000_ 0--Valid 08/18/2008 21:47:31 08/19/2008 12:35:42 8.03 114.0 / 92.3 R00083_ 02f5c859ff6484d0be8420a8a0153076_ 01_ 005_ 18--Valid 08/18/2008 09:53:22 08/19/2008 02:44:19 8.01 112.8 / 100.9 R00082_ bdaa196238145ca148606c5eb98a9438_ 03_ 000_ 7--Valid 08/18/2008 03:51:47 08/18/2008 20:06:19 8.01 107.8 / 79.5 R00082_ 7b124459a24d3f9fab1780d9f4685ad4_ 01_ 002_ 1--Valid 08/18/2008 01:31:23 08/18/2008 20:06:19 8.03 108.1 / 89.7 This is machine has gone through a lot of upgrades, Athlon 64->Athlon X2 3800+->Phenom 9600. These upgrades were done simply by changing the CPU or the CPU/motherboard, without a new OS install. I figured that the BOINC benchmark would sort it out. I understand that this (apart from being off topic), may be my problem. It just seems that all the slower computers(all of mine) mostly over claim. Sorry to be annoying. Pete edit - Just wanted to add this in(X2 3800+), interesting!. edit again - This computer only had 1gb of memory at that time!?! faah5011_ 1d4k_ 1hbv_ 00_ 2-- Valid 08/18/2008 01:48:33 08/21/2008 05:46:44 69.04 816.4 / 749.4 faah5011_ 1d4k_ 1hbv_ 00_ 1-- No Reply 07/30/2008 00:18:37 08/18/2008 00:18:37 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 faah5011_ 1d4k_ 1hbv_ 00_ 0-- Valid 07/30/2008 00:06:29 08/04/2008 05:41:17 37.70 682.5 / 749.4 "Patience is a virtue", I can't wait to learn it! [Edit 2 times, last edit by petehardy at Aug 21, 2008 10:31:23 PM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Its often way off on the cancer too, with the 2 machine quorum. These 4 jobs all took the same time to complete, but look at the third one ? Suppose it depends on the other machine still there though.
 |
||
|
|
|