Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 29
Posts: 29   Pages: 3   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 4816 times and has 28 replies Next Thread
TOMinAZ
Cruncher
United States
Joined: Feb 11, 2007
Post Count: 40
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Problems with progress calculation

Well, the last work unit that finished ran for nearly 6 days, with maybe only about 12 hours interruption. By my calculation, it took about 110 hours to actually run, and I got credit for only 61.+ hours.

I've actually timed it while running. After exactly 4 hours of running, it only showed an increase of just slightly less than 2 hours of run time.

When I see 'time estimated to completion', I usually double that time and I know that 40 or 50 hours of run time will actually take almost a week to complete. I guess BOINC's clock runs slower than realtime.

I thought maybe it was just my machine.
[Aug 1, 2008 6:14:46 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Problems with progress calculation

TOMinAZ, the time you get credit for is CPU time, not wall clock time. The discrepancy you report almost exactly matches the throttle setting of 60%. If you want to contribute more, and finish work faster, then you can select the "Maximum Output" option in your device profile.
[Aug 1, 2008 6:18:06 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Rickjb
Veteran Cruncher
Australia
Joined: Sep 17, 2006
Post Count: 666
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Problems with progress calculation

RobertM, and others confused/worried about the long FAAH WUs and erratic estimates of Completion Time:
Don't worry, everything is under control (mostly). See knreed's post in Known Issues: Long Running FightAIDS@Home Workunits
These long WUs are for the new Experiment 24, which has been given high priority. See the post by mgl_ALPerryman (FightAIDS@Home Scientist) in thread "experiment confusion" and the updated FA@H Status Page It seems that we are helping to investigate how a real HIV mutant resists real protease inhibitor drugs.
When people ask you what practical good has come from your grid computing efforts, you can show this to them!

In another thread, it was explained that the % Progress of a FAAH or DDDT WU sometimes decreases by a small amount when the application backtracks and tries a new position for a previously-positioned atom. Also, BOINC's Completion Time estimates have recently been thoroughly confused by the huge fluctuations in WU length. The combination of these effects probably explains what you've been seeing. Don't worry, be happy smile
Update: A problem has been found in the way these very long WUs were generated.
See lawrencehardin's post in the thread VERY LONG Work Unit! sad
----------------------------------------
[Edit 2 times, last edit by Rickjb at Aug 2, 2008 10:40:39 AM]
[Aug 1, 2008 6:36:48 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
smile Re: Problems with progress calculation

Rickjb, Experiment 24 to be correct.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Aug 1, 2008 6:45:56 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
TOMinAZ
Cruncher
United States
Joined: Feb 11, 2007
Post Count: 40
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
rose Re: Problems with progress calculation

TOMinAZ, the time you get credit for is CPU time, not wall clock time. The discrepancy you report almost exactly matches the throttle setting of 60%. If you want to contribute more, and finish work faster, then you can select the "Maximum Output" option in your device profile.


Of course! How silly of me. I had forgotten about the CPU throttle. I guess the difference becomes more noticeable with longer runtimes.

Thanks!
[Aug 2, 2008 12:01:26 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
robertmiles
Senior Cruncher
US
Joined: Apr 16, 2008
Post Count: 445
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Problems with progress calculation

robertmiles,

Assuming that to you the FA@H project is synonymous to WCG, you really don't have to do that suspending and it's better not to do so. BOINC keeps a Long and Short Term Debt record on seconds crunched for each project. If WCG due the long job gets too much crunching time in now, it will stop fetching work from WCG and will let the other project have a go until the balance sheet is fairly even again.

ciao


For now, I'll let WCG continue, but not for the FA@H project. After the burst of workunits expected from the non-WCG project, I'll let FA@H resume.
[Aug 2, 2008 3:03:31 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
robertmiles
Senior Cruncher
US
Joined: Apr 16, 2008
Post Count: 445
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Problems with progress calculation

Now, another faah workunit has a similar problem, but not as bad.

7/30/2008 10:31:10 AM|World Community Grid|Resuming task faah5012_1hef_1hpx_00_0 using faah version 605

If I remember correctly, this one started out with an estimate of about 44 hours required. It's now approaching 12 hours CPU time, with a progress of about 15%, with an estimate of about 41 hours to completion.


It's now approaching 22 hours CPU time and 29% Progress, with a To completion time of over 37 hours. The CPU time seems to advance a few seconds for every second of drop in the To completion time, so I suspect that the 44 hours estimated time was still a significant underestimate.


It's now at 39 hours CPU time, 51% Progress, and 29 hours To completion.

Since I'm expecting a burst of workunits from another project, I've temporarily disabled getting more workunits from the faah project.


It's now at 61 hours CPU time, 81% progress, and 13 hours to completion. At least the time to completion is decreasing about as much as the CPU time is increasing.
[Aug 3, 2008 2:13:13 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
robertmiles
Senior Cruncher
US
Joined: Apr 16, 2008
Post Count: 445
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Problems with progress calculation

Now, it errored out due to exceeding the CPU time limit (235228) and only reported the use of 22.39 hours CPU time. Someone else is running another copy now, and may have the same result in a few days.
[Aug 3, 2008 7:24:35 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
robertmiles
Senior Cruncher
US
Joined: Apr 16, 2008
Post Count: 445
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Problems with progress calculation

Is the status "Ready to Report" ?

If so, this is normal. When you finish crunching a WU, BOINC contacts the server and uploads the data but it only does this at certian times.

Results will be reported automatically at the following triggers:

1. New work is needed. Completed work will be reported at the same time.
2. The Deadline is less than 24 hours away.
3. The Result is less than the Work Buffer setting from it's Deadline
4. The Result has been in the Ready to Report status for 24 hours.

You can force the upload if required by going into Boinc manager and selecting the WU and then advanced->retry communications. If you then look in Messages, you should see something like:

29/07/2008 08:29:11|World Community Grid|Sending scheduler request: To report completed tasks. Requesting 0 seconds of work, reporting 1 completed tasks
29/07/2008 08:29:16|World Community Grid|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks

If you still have problems, please let us know what you have done and any messages that are shown.


I just had another such workunit caught at 100%. The status was ready to run, so it apparantly wasn't quite complete yet. I suspended a workunit with the status running, and the workunit with the problem took over and completed in a short time.

8/12/2008 5:39:01 PM|World Community Grid|Resuming task faah4295_indazoleOH_DiMthxbnzMIN_xmd09230_02_1 using faah version 605
8/12/2008 5:39:04 PM|World Community Grid|Computation for task faah4295_indazoleOH_DiMthxbnzMIN_xmd09230_02_1 finished
[Aug 12, 2008 11:20:15 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 29   Pages: 3   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread