| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 11
|
|
| Author |
|
|
pacerintl
Cruncher USA Joined: Nov 7, 2006 Post Count: 47 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
New Hope For HIV Vaccine: Unique HIV Vaccine Formula Elicits Strong Immune Responses
ScienceDaily (May 23, 2008) — Advanced BioScience Laboratories, Inc. (ABL) and the University of Massachusetts Medical School (UMMS) report that their unique HIV vaccine formulation was effective in eliciting strong and balanced immune responses in healthy human volunteers. In light of these initial findings, additional assays on volunteers’ samples were done by researchers at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, independently confirming the presence of long lasting and high quality T cell responses against HIV antigens. In this phase I clinical trial, sponsored by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), volunteers first received three injections of a DNA vaccine which expresses protective antigens from the HIV virus, followed by two injections of a protein vaccine whose components matched those included in the DNA vaccine. The report in Vaccine is the first scientific article in which a “DNA prime-protein boost” combination vaccination method is tested in humans for HIV vaccine development. Scientists at ABL and UMMS and their collaborators discovered that this combination approach is highly effective in inducing strong antibody and cell-mediated immune responses in human volunteers. “Given the challenges of developing a vaccine against HIV, scientists have long believed that a final, effective HIV vaccine will require the induction of balanced responses from both arms of human immune system. Our results demonstrate that it is feasible to use this combination approach to achieve this objective,” said Phillip Markham, PhD, of ABL, the Principal Investigator (PI) on this vaccine development effort, performed under contract to the NIAID. One unique design underlying this combination HIV vaccine formulation is the use of a “cocktail” of five different envelope (Env) proteins collected from HIV viruses circulating in different parts of the world. Env is a key protective antigen and the goal was to elicit broad antibody responses against a wide range of HIV viruses in order to counter the issue of frequent HIV mutations. Indeed, the high titer antibodies found in volunteers’ sera were able to recognize each of a very diverse group of Env antigens that were included in this study. More significantly, the majority of volunteers developed positive neutralizing antibodies against a good portion of the five HIV subtypes included in the assay. Shan Lu, MD, PhD, professor of medicine and biochemistry & molecular pharmacology at the University of Massachusetts Medical School and the co- Principal Investigator (co-PI) of the vaccine development program, describes the finding of neutralizing antibodies in this study as “a major step forward.” “Previously, we didn’t know where to start. The neutralizing antibody titers in our study are still relatively low, but, these results are promising and open the door for future efforts to optimize HIV vaccine formulations in order to achieve a protective HIV vaccine,” said Dr. Lu. The dominant approaches in the current HIV vaccine field rely on viral vector-based delivery systems, an approach that produced disappointing results in a recent efficacy trial. Drs. Markham and Lu believe their HIV vaccine strategy will offer an alternative approach to focus on the induction of protective antibodies for HIV vaccine development, while maintaining strong cell-mediated immune responses. In addition to NIH, the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI) also provided funding support to part of the study. Researchers from Duke University Medical School also participated, as did Dr. Paul Goepfert at the University of Alabama-Birmingham. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/05/080522104439.htm |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I do hope that we find a cure/vaccine....it's just that HIV is such a difficult virus in so many aspects.
|
||
|
|
sansanwawa
Cruncher Joined: Apr 25, 2008 Post Count: 40 Status: Offline |
I hope too, all my CPU resources dedicated to find the cure.
----------------------------------------May God give the clue for all the scientist to find the cure. |
||
|
|
robertmiles
Senior Cruncher US Joined: Apr 16, 2008 Post Count: 445 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I found a web site on another approach to developing a vaccine for AIDS:
<http://arstechnica.com/journals/science.ars/2...kes-for-good-vaccines> |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hello,
This response focuses on mediation of immune cell system(cytokine response to be more exact) response vs vaccination. Not to subvert the existing established scientific community or the possibility of a vaccination, but I believe there are serious flaws and rifts that need to be corrected first. First off, I recommend everyone to watch the "The STRECKER Memorandum" on YouTube and to see how and why HIV violates ALL acceptable protocols for a vaccination. This is very old knowledge, but I believe still valid. Another opinion of mine. It seems the establishment doesn't properly recognize the importance of restoring the relationship between insufficient cytokine release by the HIV infected cells and terminal infection. Phagocytes work by engulging and digesting pathogens. Cytokines released from the infected cells trigger an attack by Phagocytes amongst other immune system responses. This is one of the most basic mechanisms. Drugs need to reverse and MEDIATE the basic mechanisms under which HIV effectively suppresses healthy responses. I know submitting such a response is highly controversial, but let's face it that the accepted, normal scientific practice has obviously failed the world up to this point. I wonder if these scientists do any real work at all other then publish half useless literature to make more 'career progression?' |
||
|
|
Dan60
Senior Cruncher Brazil Joined: Mar 29, 2006 Post Count: 185 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Hello, This response focuses on mediation of immune cell system(cytokine response to be more exact) response vs vaccination. Not to subvert the existing established scientific community or the possibility of a vaccination, but I believe there are serious flaws and rifts that need to be corrected first. First off, I recommend everyone to watch the "The STRECKER Memorandum" on YouTube and to see how and why HIV violates ALL acceptable protocols for a vaccination. This is very old knowledge, but I believe still valid. Another opinion of mine. It seems the establishment doesn't properly recognize the importance of restoring the relationship between insufficient cytokine release by the HIV infected cells and terminal infection. Phagocytes work by engulging and digesting pathogens. Cytokines released from the infected cells trigger an attack by Phagocytes amongst other immune system responses. This is one of the most basic mechanisms. Drugs need to reverse and MEDIATE the basic mechanisms under which HIV effectively suppresses healthy responses. I know submitting such a response is highly controversial, but let's face it that the accepted, normal scientific practice has obviously failed the world up to this point. I wonder if these scientists do any real work at all other then publish half useless literature to make more 'career progression?' So, would you agree with (?): A good news, pathologist found the weakness HIV virus http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080715165520.htm As one can read in the article "The Achilles heel, a tiny stretch of amino acids numbered 421-433 on gp120...", this might be under FightAIDS@Home project too |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
NO, I do NOT agree an effective vaccination against HIV is possible.
However, I do believe scientists can design drugs to counter/restore the actions HIV takes against the immune system. These anti-viral drugs can lead to almost a full restoration of a 'pseudo effective' immune system against HIV. The benefit would end with discontinued drug use as not every last partical of HIV can be destroyed. Perhaps a vaccination can aid the immune system, but can never totally restore or rid itself of HIV itself. At best, it could help to 'stale mate' the virus for an indefinite period of time...so long as the person remains healthy and strong. The Strecker Memorandum states HIV is an animal to human 'hybrid virus' created from two seperate viruses. As to say, two viruses infected the same cell and then recombined(recombinant virus). Some think such a freak occurance would need devine intervention(man). Of course, this is only a theory and nobody really knows...and nature has the power to surprised the best minds in the world! |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hello,
An after thought on eradication of rNA retro viruses from the immune system. I would suppose everyone would expect the goal of vaccination/drugs would be the eradication of the HIV particle from the immune system. My opinion is that one day in the more distant future(2040) they might be smart enough to use the very rNA against the virus against itself. I am saying they would use the relatively 'unstable' nature of rNA(mutation ability) to create an irreversible 'polymerase' fusion like reaction which would liberate energy and internally destroy the virus strands itself. This would be similiar to starting the virus on fire from the inside out. It is process I believe that can rid the virus from the body if anything. Drugs would be designed to initiate this powerful reaction within the deep within the virus capsid at it's fundamental core structure. This is a very radical idea for the age we live in right now and it's unlikely any respectable/rogue scientist would give the time of day to such an idea. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Sorry, for making the last post complicated. I am saying, vaccination is no little use against hiv.
Powerful drugs capable of erradication of HIV will probably involve polymerization of the HIV Poly-nucleotides and other key structures. These would be a new class of drugs which would operate inside the virus capsid itself. Our current technology is 'lucky' to even designed drugs to operate inside the cell much less a virus capsid like HIV. Scrutinization of what I said is welcome by all to include any Scientific input or what appears to be incorrect statements. |
||
|
|
Dan60
Senior Cruncher Brazil Joined: Mar 29, 2006 Post Count: 185 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Sorry, for making the last post complicated. I am saying, vaccination is no little use against hiv. Powerful drugs capable of erradication of HIV will probably involve polymerization of the HIV Poly-nucleotides and other key structures. These would be a new class of drugs which would operate inside the virus capsid itself. Our current technology is 'lucky' to even designed drugs to operate inside the cell much less a virus capsid like HIV. Scrutinization of what I said is welcome by all to include any Scientific input or what appears to be incorrect statements. Thank you, Sir, for keeping up the hope ![]() |
||
|
|
|