Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research Forum: Nutritious Rice for the World Thread: timing and work in Rice |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 4
|
Author |
|
Richard Mitnick
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Feb 28, 2007 Post Count: 583 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
I am trying to make sense of the timing and work in Rice. If one has up the graphic, one can see the progress in two thermometers:
----------------------------------------"work unit" [wu], which is the totality, and "next structure" [ns]. On a dual core, each ns took about 1.75 minutes, and completed .22% of the wu. So, that means, 100%wu/.22wu= 454.54 ns's. so, 454 X 1.75=794.5 minutes, or 13.24 hours. On a PIII each ns took 5.66 minutes and completed 1.11% of the wu, so 90.09 ns , so 90.09 X 5.4=486.48 minutes, or 8.1 hours. So, is the 8 hour thing a nominal measure like when we are told a download will take a certain amount of time at 56k? A colleague has stated that the two very different machines will get the same amount of work done. I think that this is an impossibility. I would like some clarification. >>RSM |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
We keep saying this. No matter, we will say it again: each work unit will complete as many structures as it can in 8 hours. Simple as that.
|
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Mitch,
----------------------------------------the Units of Data and the computation of credit is explained here: http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/printpost?post=165595
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
Richard Mitnick
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Feb 28, 2007 Post Count: 583 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
Thanks, I had not seen the other posts, now everything that I saw myself has been confirmed, esp 1000 vs 160 ns completed.
---------------------------------------->>RSM |
||
|
|