Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 10
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1470 times and has 9 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
?errors

just reported these tasks and they where considered errors although the wu's were uploaded before the deadline

BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100304_ 2-- CASE Error 04/20/2008 02:35:25 04/20/2008 09:01:25 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100061_ 2-- CASE Error 04/20/2008 02:35:25 04/20/2008 09:01:25 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100148_ 3-- CASE Error 04/20/2008 02:35:25 04/20/2008 09:01:25 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100232_ 2-- CASE Error 04/20/2008 02:35:25 04/20/2008 09:01:25 0.00 0.0 / 0.0

logs for all four show

Result Log

<core_client_version>5.10.45</core_client_version>



Sun 20 Apr 2008 04:59:52 AM EDT|World Community Grid|Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. Requesting 0 seconds of work, reporting 4 completed tasks
Sun 20 Apr 2008 04:59:57 AM EDT|World Community Grid|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks
Sun 20 Apr 2008 05:00:59 AM EDT|World Community Grid|Sending scheduler request: To report completed tasks. Requesting 0 seconds of work, reporting 4 completed tasks
Sun 20 Apr 2008 05:01:04 AM EDT|World Community Grid|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks


Still have these working. Should I abort?
Why such short and strict turnaround times?


Result Name Status Sent Time Time Due /
Return Time CPU Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit
BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100152_ 3-- In Progress 04/20/2008 07:31:49 04/20/2008 12:19:49 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100152_ 2-- No Reply 04/20/2008 02:35:25 04/20/2008 07:27:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 mine
BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100152_ 0-- Pending Validation 04/19/2008 01:36:17 04/19/2008 05:07:27 3.37 42.5 / 0.0
BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100152_ 1-- No Reply 04/19/2008 01:23:12 04/20/2008 01:23:12 0.00 0.0 / 0.0



Result Name Status Sent Time Time Due /
Return Time CPU Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit
BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100033_ 4-- In Progress 04/20/2008 07:33:39 04/20/2008 12:21:39 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100033_ 3-- No Reply 04/20/2008 02:35:25 04/20/2008 07:27:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 mine
BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100033_ 2-- No Reply 04/20/2008 02:05:17 04/20/2008 02:25:58 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100033_ 0-- Pending Validation 04/19/2008 01:38:46 04/19/2008 07:23:13 3.40 48.3 / 0.0
BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100033_ 1-- No Reply 04/19/2008 01:23:12 04/20/2008 01:23:12 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Apr 21, 2008 5:54:34 AM]
[Apr 20, 2008 9:38:37 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: ?errors

The error work units are not shown in the log you provided. They were all reported at the same time. Did you abort them? Were they aborted by the server?

If your work is returned late, then it will be marked "Too late", not "Error".

Beta work has a short deadline so that it is given high priority and the beta can be completed quickly.
[Apr 20, 2008 9:48:11 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: ?errors

They were aborted by server, I presume because they were not received by the 04/20/2008 07:27:32 deadline. They were only sent out at 04/20/2008 02:35:25

Of the two still working< marked mine< I am going to delete 1 and let the other one finish and report late to see how they are handled.

Result Name Status Sent Time Time Due /
Return Time CPU Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit
BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100152_ 3-- In Progress 04/20/2008 07:31:49 04/20/2008 12:19:49 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100152_ 2-- No Reply 04/20/2008 02:35:25 04/20/2008 07:27:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 mine
BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100152_ 0-- Pending Validation 04/19/2008 01:36:17 04/19/2008 05:07:27 3.37 42.5 / 0.0
BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100152_ 1-- No Reply 04/19/2008 01:23:12 04/20/2008 01:23:12 0.00 0.0 / 0.0



Result Name Status Sent Time Time Due /
Return Time CPU Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit
BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100033_ 4-- In Progress 04/20/2008 07:33:39 04/20/2008 12:21:39 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100033_ 3-- No Reply 04/20/2008 02:35:25 04/20/2008 07:27:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 mine
BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100033_ 2-- No Reply 04/20/2008 02:05:17 04/20/2008 02:25:58 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100033_ 0-- Pending Validation 04/19/2008 01:38:46 04/19/2008 07:23:13 3.40 48.3 / 0.0
BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100033_ 1-- No Reply 04/19/2008 01:23:12 04/20/2008 01:23:12 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
[Apr 20, 2008 10:06:09 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: ?errors

exited and restarted and got red carded. Time too short.

Sun 20 Apr 2008 06:49:43 AM EDT|World Community Grid|Task BETA_dddt0202b0061_100152_2 is 0.14 days overdue.
Sun 20 Apr 2008 06:49:43 AM EDT|World Community Grid|You may not get credit for it. Consider aborting it.
Sun 20 Apr 2008 06:49:43 AM EDT|World Community Grid|Task BETA_dddt0202b0061_100033_3 is 0.14 days overdue.
Sun 20 Apr 2008 06:49:43 AM EDT|World Community Grid|You may not get credit for it. Consider aborting it.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Apr 21, 2008 5:56:29 AM]
[Apr 20, 2008 10:59:56 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
retsof
Former Community Advisor
USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2005
Post Count: 6824
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: ?errors

I don't think that the beta deadline is as strict as production deadlines. They may just be setting them short to encourage your system to work on them. The techs don't really want to sit around for two weeks before checking some results.
----------------------------------------
SUPPORT ADVISOR
Work+GPU i7 8700 12threads
School i7 4770 8threads
Default+GPU Ryzen 7 3700X 16threads
Ryzen 7 3800X 16 threads
Ryzen 9 3900X 24threads
Home i7 3540M 4threads50%
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by retsof at Apr 20, 2008 12:29:20 PM]
[Apr 20, 2008 12:27:43 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: ?errors

Unless a Beta unit gets caught in an infinite loop, let it run. The idea is to find any problems. Deadlines are just used to make BOINC run them quickly.

Lawrence
[Apr 20, 2008 12:46:08 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: ?errors

I don't think that the beta deadline is as strict as production deadlines. They may just be setting them short to encourage your system to work on them. The techs don't really want to sit around for two weeks before checking some results.


In this case it seems for some reason they are strict. The server aborted four of them and suggested I abort the other two,

04/20/2008 07:27:32 deadline. They were only sent out at 04/20/2008 02:35:25

The third machine was only allowed 21minutes and 41 seconds to report. Failing, it was then sent to my machine.


BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100033_ 4-- Valid 04/20/2008 07:33:39 04/20/2008 12:19:57 4.75 38.1 / 43.2
BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100033_ 3-- Error 04/20/2008 02:35:25 04/20/2008 10:54:54 2.88 30.1 / 0.0
BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100033_ 2-- No Reply 04/20/2008 02:05:17 04/20/2008 02:25:58 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100033_ 0-- Valid 04/19/2008 01:38:46 04/19/2008 07:23:13 3.40 48.3 / 43.2
BETA_ dddt0202b0061_ 100033_ 1-- No Reply 04/19/2008 01:23:12 04/20/2008 01:23:12 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
[Apr 20, 2008 2:36:08 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: ?errors

To accelerate a test, extra copies are send out at times to get quickly to quorum (That's why FAAH & DDDT production work now has a 3rd copy circulated as per announcement in the Known Issues forum). The system worked exactly as intended. All unstarted work was canceled on first server contact and that what was started, could be left to run and fetch points or chosen to manually abort, at which time no credit is given for time already computed.

Is back-ground, set and forget idle cpu cycle volunteering not wonderfully efficient?
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Apr 20, 2008 2:51:37 PM]
[Apr 20, 2008 2:51:09 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: ?errors

Yes it is. I think I'll remove the pebcac factor and let it do it's stuff.

Thanks
[Apr 20, 2008 3:44:25 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: ?errors

Theory is that if the feedback is digested and the patient has progressed beyond the temporal, the pebkac affliction most often is remedied too :D

enjoy and thanks for contributing to this greater cause.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Apr 20, 2008 4:05:09 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread