| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Community
Forum: Chat Room
Thread: The Missing Stats Graphs |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 22
|
|
| Author |
|
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
----------------------------------------  |
||
|
|
retsof
Former Community Advisor USA Joined: Jul 31, 2005 Post Count: 6824 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
It is also uncannily dynamic. It's flat when I first look at it, and climbs to a larger number of users.
----------------------------------------
SUPPORT ADVISOR
Work+GPU i7 8700 12threads School i7 4770 8threads Default+GPU Ryzen 7 3700X 16threads Ryzen 7 3800X 16 threads Ryzen 9 3900X 24threads Home i7 3540M 4threads50% |
||
|
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
but uncannily no increase in the daily amount of number crunching
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor Normandy - France Joined: Jan 26, 2007 Post Count: 3716 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
"The missing stats graph"?
----------------------------------------For me it is your second one.  Where I think you intended to put a second graph I only see a puzzling empty space. Anyway have no regrets: if it is this graph which allows you to say that there is "no increase in the daily amount of number crunching" it is wrong anyway!Whether looking at the little interesting (*) runtime or the more interesting number of points anybody with the right figures sees that there is a tremendous increase. 40-50 % more runtime when compared to one year ago. And about 130 % more points (i.e. 2.3 times more). Anything wrong in your methodology? (*) I say little interesting for the runtime because nowadays runtime is essentially CPU time (from Boinc members), while it was essentially wallclock time (from UD members) one year ago. Cheers. Jean. |
||
|
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Compared with a Year ago of course there is more crunching going on but we seem to have been static for a while now.
----------------------------------------What the graphs show is that despite the increased numbers the daily amount of crunching is not going up in response. The graphs show that we are currently treading water probably losing as many crunchers as we are gaining at the moment They also show that the number of crunchers which should be logarithmic as more crunchers tell more crunchers about the WCG isn't The graphs also show that no large influxes of new users arrive with the addition of any new partners just the slow steady trickle. IBM and CA's should be concerned as to why this is |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
It's like the climate observations Dave.... you stick your nose out the window and today things 'look' bad to you. Taking a micro-view tells nothing about the overarching progress like this:
----------------------------------------
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Feb 3, 2008 7:29:23 PM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I'll go further, David: those graphs of yours use just about all of those misleading tricks you complain about so bitterly.
Physician, heal thyself! :-p You know I'm joking, right? |
||
|
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
There's 70 days worth in there I don't have any records before that time (hence the offset)
----------------------------------------So that's what 2 Months 10 days? What I say above holds true over this period including all those christmas present PC's D I thought you had lost your sense of humour just yesterday and taken your bat home No sorry that should be Didactylos   |
||
|
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
No no matter how much you stretch them bullet straight
----------------------------------------(A turn of phrase not the mathematical parabola of a bullet in flight) The lengths you have to go to for the pedantic |
||
|
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I wonder how many more CA's I can get to come out of the woodwork and dismiss this information extracted from IBM's own RSS Stats Feed?
----------------------------------------We are not reaching our Market. We are not converting the sale and we need to find out why. Our product couldn't be better. Why isn't our message getting through? What could we do differently? I keep asking the question but nothing ever changes here's those meta tags from today's website <meta name="Description" content="World Community Grid"/> <meta name="Abstract" content="World Community Grid"/> <meta name="Keywords" content="World Community Grid, Technology Solving Problems"/> Look familiar? |
||
|
|
|