| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 12
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I looked in the help file, that says something about how points are calculated, but i dont get it.
your amount of points is the representation, of how much you have meant for WCG, right? how is it calculated? is it, the more points, the more calculations made? or what? how can you get more points? |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Every time you complete and submit a work unit you are granted a certain amount of points for it - the more work units you complete, the more points you get.
Points are really only for the fun element, the important thing is the amount of work you complete - if you want more points then do more work ![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hello chriskrazz,
BOINC keeps track of how long your CPU spent processing a work unit. Every 5 days or so it runs a benchmark on your computer, measuring your Whetstone and Dhrystone benchmark speeds (floating point and integer arithmetic). It adds these 2 benchmarks together, divides by (I think) 480, then multiplies the number of hours spent processing the work unit to produce the number of BOINC points requested for that result. Then there is a complicated algorithm that compares that value with what other computers request for the same work unit to decide what is finally awarded. So it is a measure of the effort you have made to compute the result. Lawrence |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I think my explanation was simpler Lawrence
![]() |
||
|
|
MD-Crusher
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Jul 23, 2007 Post Count: 52 Status: Offline |
Liking neither explanation too well
Points are the "weighted representation of contribution". Tasks need widely varying numbers of operations to complete and computational power of computer differentiates tremendously. It thus equates that points reflect the relative work completed in comparison to other contributors and members should be proud of having many, but every point is equally valuable.![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
so if someone has to a certain project, and it takes 15 hours to complete, lets say he'd get 500 points. would someone else, if he has a faster computer, and it took him only 5 hours, still get 500 points for that same project?
if thats the case, then i get it. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
With a few minor variations, that just about sums it up
![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
so its not the same for them? is this because of the lack of precision of the point calculations?
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
We would like to measure the total effort required to achieve a result. However, this will change according to the particular instructions selected by a compiler for that particular OS and CPU type, so it will only be an approximation. Realizing this, we use the computer clock and award points for time spent according to the standard Dhrystone and Whetstone benchmarks. It is only a rough approximation, but it gets the job done.
And we can stay warm on cold winter nights by arguing over better (different) ways to award points.Lawrence |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
And we can stay warm on cold winter nights by arguing over better (different) ways to award points.Lawrence Ah....those were the days!! ![]() |
||
|
|
|