Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 3
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1175 times and has 2 replies Next Thread
l_mckeon
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Post Count: 439
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Human Pre-processing?

I believe my last WU had obvious crystals in it (X0000047651169200503181257_2), yet the program still had to carry on for 5 hours of processing.

Have you considered giving batches of images to volunteers to check for obvious targets before sending the more obscure images off to the computers?

I believe you might both speed-up results and reduce the load on the grid computers. Assuming 5 seconds per image, that's 720 images per hour; a small number of people could go through tens of thousands of images in a few weeks.

LM
[Dec 5, 2007 1:31:53 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Diana G.
Master Cruncher
Joined: Apr 6, 2005
Post Count: 3003
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Human Pre-processing?

Hi LM. I am not sure if you have read this thread which gives us lots of info concerning this project:

https://secure.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewthread?thread=16925

Hope this answers your questions smile If you need anything more just ask :)

Happy crunching!

Diana
----------------------------------------

[Dec 5, 2007 1:55:44 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Human Pre-processing?

But can the average person tell the difference between a crystal and a microcrystal? I don't think I could. I know I couldn't tell the difference between a precipitate, phase separation or skin effect.

If all the scientists wanted were the obvious candidates, then yes - this would be a good candidate for distributed human checking. But if that was all they wanted, a really simple line detection filter would spit out the candidates much quicker than humans could.

However, the scientists want more data, hence the longer work units. The first load of work units have already been classified by human experts as a control. So, the scientists may be able to drop filters that don't provide useful results, shortening the work unit length. If the filters are letting false negatives slip through, then they will need further refinement.

It's a process. It isn't like a simple production line.
[Dec 5, 2007 7:04:34 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread