Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 10
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 826 times and has 9 replies Next Thread
Protego
Cruncher
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Post Count: 33
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
A Problem with a faah work unit ??

I just saw ... the work unit completed in less than 10% it normally take.
Most likely a problem on my comuter, and then some bug with the error message.

ID: faah1932_ d017n467_ x2AZC_ 01_ 1
Status: Valid
Sent time: 07/20/2007 13:43:12
Return time: 07/23/2007 13:32:10
CPU time: 5.19
Credit claimed: 9.4 / Granted: 65.6

I would prefer if this WU could be resent.
-- best regards
----------------------------------------

[Jul 23, 2007 1:54:18 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: A Problem with a faah work unit ??

If it's marked as "Valid", then it isn't your computer's fault.

The techs may want to double-check it, though.
[Jul 23, 2007 1:59:59 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: A Problem with a faah work unit ??

I just saw ... the work unit completed in less than 10% it normally take.
Most likely a problem on my comuter, and then some bug with the error message.

ID: faah1932_ d017n467_ x2AZC_ 01_ 1
Status: Valid
Sent time: 07/20/2007 13:43:12
Return time: 07/23/2007 13:32:10
CPU time: 5.19
Credit claimed: 9.4 / Granted: 65.6

I would prefer if this WU could be resent.
-- best regards

If the job ran uninterrupted (no project switching or the like), your message log could actually tell when the task started and finished. We occasionally see obscure short or zero run time reporting and the WU still validating. It's interesting to know which client version, official or alternate build, and what OS was running.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Jul 23, 2007 2:15:13 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Protego
Cruncher
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Post Count: 33
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
smile Re: A Problem with a faah work unit ??

Yes.
I see what I can collect.
Where should I send the data? The Forum seems to be possibly
not the right place.

I have checked on some other machines, and the WU compute time is varying, but no one is even close to this short.
----------------------------------------

[Jul 23, 2007 2:52:55 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: A Problem with a faah work unit ??

Send it with the Device/Host ID (a 5 or 6 digit number), to support@worldcommunitygrid.org, but tell us anyhow here the version info and OS. Might help us correlate with other posted anomalies.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Jul 23, 2007 3:24:48 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor
Normandy - France
Joined: Jan 26, 2007
Post Count: 3715
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: A Problem with a faah work unit ??

The HPF2 WU I am still computing has already two "Pending Validation" results (out of 9) showing Time 0.00 and Claimed 0.0. In addition to the problem that may be behind these figures I am wondering: are these zeroes contributing to the Granted value? smile

Those WUs are
le725_00025_9_15-- and le725_00025_9_18--
(and mine is le725_00025_9_9--).

Cheers. Jean.
----------------------------------------
Team--> Decrypthon -->Statistics/Join -->Thread
[Jul 23, 2007 4:19:45 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: A Problem with a faah work unit ??

Jean,

At least when I last summed having had such a case with a WU i did, it only included those values that were *not* deviating extremely from the median. Take e.g. the total of the ones that have a seeming realistic claim and divide by their total e.g. the initial 13 in your case.

Wait until the quorum is validated and verify if that still stands.

cheers
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
----------------------------------------
[Edit 2 times, last edit by Sekerob at Jul 23, 2007 4:36:18 PM]
[Jul 23, 2007 4:32:58 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
retsof
Former Community Advisor
USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2005
Post Count: 6824
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: A Problem with a faah work unit ??

???

Considering the way the data is cut into workunits, could there be a leftover one now and then? That happened a lot with the old grid.org. The algorithm was recently changed to make workunits a bit shorter anyway, so could there be a difference in the end units?

I have seen one or two close to 1/2 to 2/3 size, but nothing this small.

The techs will await your report of success with the device number.

???
----------------------------------------
SUPPORT ADVISOR
Work+GPU i7 8700 12threads
School i7 4770 8threads
Default+GPU Ryzen 7 3700X 16threads
Ryzen 7 3800X 16 threads
Ryzen 9 3900X 24threads
Home i7 3540M 4threads50%
----------------------------------------
[Edit 2 times, last edit by retsof at Jul 23, 2007 10:24:29 PM]
[Jul 23, 2007 10:22:10 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor
Normandy - France
Joined: Jan 26, 2007
Post Count: 3715
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: A Problem with a faah work unit ??

Wait until the quorum is validated and verify if that still stands
I forgot that "Pending Validation" can also lead to an "Invalid" status... which is what finally happened to these 2 WUs.

Cheers. Jean.
----------------------------------------
Team--> Decrypthon -->Statistics/Join -->Thread
[Jul 24, 2007 9:41:42 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Protego
Cruncher
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Post Count: 33
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: A Problem with a faah work unit ??

Short data of computer:
Windows 98 4.10.1998
96 MB RAM. Run OK with 96 MB, no problem!
BOINC client version 5.8.16 for windows_intelx86
Processor: 1 GenuineIntel Pentium(r) II Processor [Pentium(r) II Processor] [fpu mmx]
Memory: 95.39 MB physical, 1.91 GB virtual

RESULT STATUS:
faah1932_d017n779_x2AZC_01_2 asus In Progress
faah1932_d017n467_x2AZC_01_1 asus Valid 5.19
faah1904_d223n719_x2AZ9_01_2 asus Valid 43.74
faah1889_d192n065_x2AZ9_01_0 asus Valid 58.46
faah1866_d146n273_x2AZ9_02_2 asus Valid 48.59
faah1851_d116n260_x2AZ9_00_0 asus Valid 48.71
----------------------------------------

[Jul 24, 2007 11:04:49 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread