Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 2
|
![]() |
Author |
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I recently read somewhere that sections of DNA that were previously thought to be "junk" are actually useful bits of DNA. They are apparently used for the early parts of life.
Anyhow, I was curious if we're comparing the entire genomes or only selected portions? G-Man |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hello GeoffreyF67,
If you look at the Genome Comparison Status page at http://www.dbbm.fiocruz.br/labwim/bioinfoteam...eComparison/progress.html you will read that we are comparing protein sequences in the genomes. Yes, there are apparently as many genes that produce non-coding RNA (RNA that is not used to produce protein) as there are involved in protein synthesis, but we do not yet know how to identify them. Here is an article about this type of 'junk' DNA: http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewthread?thread=1368#15258 Lawrence |
||
|
|
![]() |