Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go ยป
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 2
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 2086 times and has 1 reply Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Junk DNA Comparison?

I recently read somewhere that sections of DNA that were previously thought to be "junk" are actually useful bits of DNA. They are apparently used for the early parts of life.

Anyhow, I was curious if we're comparing the entire genomes or only selected portions?

G-Man
[Apr 26, 2007 12:58:01 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Junk DNA Comparison?

Hello GeoffreyF67,
If you look at the Genome Comparison Status page at http://www.dbbm.fiocruz.br/labwim/bioinfoteam...eComparison/progress.html you will read that we are comparing protein sequences in the genomes. Yes, there are apparently as many genes that produce non-coding RNA (RNA that is not used to produce protein) as there are involved in protein synthesis, but we do not yet know how to identify them. Here is an article about this type of 'junk' DNA: http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewthread?thread=1368#15258

Lawrence
[Apr 26, 2007 2:06:38 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread