Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 2
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 577 times and has 1 reply Next Thread
Blikbrein
Cruncher
Joined: Jan 14, 2007
Post Count: 1
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Most bang for the buck

One for the technical folks at WCG: Which choice would cause the task to execute faster in a 1 Gb RAM / 3.8 Gb chip PC? (1) increasing the RAM to more than 1 Gb or (2) adding an extra chip?
[Feb 10, 2007 2:02:47 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Most bang for the buck

Hi Blikbrein,
worried
I do not really understand your question.
1 Gb RAM / 3.8 Gb chip PC? confused
Maybe you mean 3.8 Ghz CPU. In that case I can say that our largest project - Help Defeat Cancer - runs quite well in 1 GB of RAM but does not leave much room for a second project. The other projects can run at least 2 work units simultaneously in 1 GB if you have 2 cores, but 2 of our second-largest project (HPF2) might slow down a little from time to time due to memory contention. The smaller projects can all run at full speed with a multi-core CPU. In general, a dual-core CPU is the best way to speed up a computer's output. You just have to keep track of the individual project sizes and perhaps avoid the projects with the largest memory requirements.

Lawrence
[Feb 10, 2007 2:36:43 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread