Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 7
|
![]() |
Author |
|
cio_redulla
Advanced Cruncher Philippines Joined: Apr 24, 2006 Post Count: 130 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My computer's been crunching only fcg units this week and it takes about 1 - 1.5 hours to finish one unit. I noticed that the remaining units (with report deadlines on Feb 9) took a longer time than the other units. It took almost 3 hours to finish units 10000693 and 10000694.
----------------------------------------cio_redulla ![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
This is probably normal. There are bigger and smaller genes in the Human Genome, so if a unit is composed of bigger genes it should take longer to crunch it.
|
||
|
Brecht Crombez
Cruncher Joined: Oct 16, 2006 Post Count: 40 Status: Offline |
i'm not sure, but i think it's not the different genes that make a WU longer or not, but the complexity of the proteins of those genes that are compared...
could be wrong... |
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
On a single box I've had run times of 1:16 to 3:40 hours for the Genome project. Not all pack the equal amount of work. It's how its being chopped up in the libraries that we're crunching thru and what is compared with what.
----------------------------------------Other projects indeed have a complexity tag to them. Anyway, it's normal for work to vary in length. Where to look is A. Do they get to 100%, B. Does it get returned C.. Do you get Credit. If so, all is fine.
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
retsof
Former Community Advisor USA Joined: Jul 31, 2005 Post Count: 6824 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Workunits can finish, but I still see a wild variation in length. My slowest computer has been very well behaved over the last 2 weeks. Suspending network activity is also helpful when not actually sending in anything. Workunits complete in 3-5 hours.
----------------------------------------ON THE OTHER HAND, the current nasty one is at 25 hours and has made it to 88%. It may be time for a reboot. This could also be a symptom of the Win98 memory leaks piling up. The faster AMD 2.4GHz machines here can run a GC in 1/2 to 1 hour.
SUPPORT ADVISOR
----------------------------------------Work+GPU i7 8700 12threads School i7 4770 8threads Default+GPU Ryzen 7 3700X 16threads Ryzen 7 3800X 16 threads Ryzen 9 3900X 24threads Home i7 3540M 4threads50% [Edit 1 times, last edit by retsof at Jun 16, 2007 1:13:11 PM] |
||
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7745 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
http://img385.imageshack.us/img385/526/blahhmb1.jpg
----------------------------------------This is a screen shot of my slowest machine results. It is a 497 mhz PII. I would not be too worried. Even the small GC jobs take a long time on a slow machine. Double digit hours are not too uncommon. Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
retsof
Former Community Advisor USA Joined: Jul 31, 2005 Post Count: 6824 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We're at about the same place. The 500 MHz machine was fading as it had been running for a week. I'll watch the benchmarks more carefully.
----------------------------------------Before 22 MIPS floating (Whetstone) 38 MIPS integer (Dhrystone) and after a reboot 417 MIPS floating (Whetstone) 708 MIPS integer (Dhrystone) 2.4GHz AMD machines 6/14/2007 8:57:32 AM|| 2286 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 6/14/2007 8:57:32 AM|| 4057 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
SUPPORT ADVISOR
----------------------------------------Work+GPU i7 8700 12threads School i7 4770 8threads Default+GPU Ryzen 7 3700X 16threads Ryzen 7 3800X 16 threads Ryzen 9 3900X 24threads Home i7 3540M 4threads50% [Edit 2 times, last edit by retsof at Jun 16, 2007 7:21:04 PM] |
||
|
|
![]() |